ArticleEcology and evolution2020
Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Not just flowering time: a resurrection approach shows floral attraction traits are changing over time.Evolution letters · 2023Article
- Morphological Continua Make Poor Species: Genus-Wide Morphometric Survey of the European Bee Orchids (Biology · 2023Article
- Monotropastrum kirishimense (Ericaceae), a new mycoheterotrophic plant from Japan based on multifaceted evidence.Journal of plant research · 2023Article
- Trait analysis in a population of the Greater Butterfly-orchid observed through a 16-year period.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Reproductive Isolation Among Three Nocturnal Moth-Pollinated SympatricFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Vertebrate herbivory weakens directional selection for earlier emergence in competition.Evolution letters · 2021Article
- Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Closely related species often differ in traits that influence reproductive success, suggesting that divergent selection on such traits contribute to the maintenance of species boundaries. G
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.