Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32607176›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Interspecific comparison of the fecal microbiota structure in three Arctic migratory bird species.

Hyunjun Cho, Won Young Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metagenomic Profiling of Barn Owl (Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Metagenomic analysis of the gut microbiota inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Exploring bacterial diversity in Arctic fjord sediments: a 16S rRNA-based metabarcoding portrait.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Intestinal Microbiota ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyunjun ChoDivision of Polar Life Sciences Korea Polar Research Institute Incheon Korea.
Won Young LeeDivision of Polar Life Sciences Korea Polar Research Institute Incheon Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5658-6341
Korea Polar Research Institute · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota of birds is known to be characterized for different species, although it may change with feeding items. In this study, we compared the gut microbiota of birds with different feeding behaviors in the same habitat. We collected fecal samples from three Arctic species, snow buntings

Indexed as

Arctic birdsdietfecal bacteriafeeding behaviorgut microbiota

Identifiers

PMID32607176
PMCPMC7319242
OpenAlexW3026679832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.