Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32607155›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Is foraging innovation lost following colonization of a less variable environment? A case study in surface- vs. cave-dwelling

Gábor Herczeg, Viktória P Hafenscher, Gergely Balázs, Žiga Fišer, Simona Kralj-Fišer, Gergely Horváth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gábor HerczegBehavioural Ecology Group Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology Biological Institute Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0441-342X
Viktória P HafenscherBehavioural Ecology Group Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology Biological Institute Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.
Gergely BalázsBehavioural Ecology Group Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology Biological Institute Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.
Žiga FišerDepartment of Biology Biotechnical Faculty University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-5173
Simona Kralj-FišerInstitute of Biology Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts Ljubljana Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-2332
Gergely HorváthBehavioural Ecology Group Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology Biological Institute Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0485-333X
Eötvös Loránd University · HUSlovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral innovation is a key process for successful colonization of new habitat types. However, it is costly due to the necessary cognitive and neural demands and typically connected to ecological generalism. Therefore, loss of behavioral innovativeness is predicted following colonization of new, simple, and invariable environments. We tested this prediction by studying foraging innovativeness in the freshwater isopod

Indexed as

adaptationbehavioral flexibilitybehavioral innovationcolonizationplasticity

Identifiers

PMID32607155
PMCPMC7319158
OpenAlexW3021261134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.