Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32607090›Full record

ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2020

Essential Oils and Health.

J Tyler Ramsey, B Carrie Shropshire, Tibor R Nagy, Kevin D Chambers, Yin Li, Kenneth S Korach

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Exploring the Nutraceutical Potential ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Modulation of the Volatile Profile of Cardamom (Food science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Tyler RamseyCampbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC.
B Carrie ShropshireCampbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC.
Tibor R NagyCampbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC.
Kevin D ChambersCampbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC.
Yin LiReproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Kenneth S KorachReproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Campbell University · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · US

Funding

Chemical Receptor Interactions In Reproduction And Hormonal ToxicityZIAES070065 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KORACH, KENNETH S · 2009 to 2019
$29.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES070065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Essential oils (EOs) have risen in popularity over the past decade. These oils function in society as holistic integrative modalities to traditional medicinal treatments, where many Americans substitute EOs in place of other prescribed medications. EOs are found in a multitude of products including food flavoring, soaps, lotions, shampoos, hair styling products, cologne, laundry detergents, and even insect repellents. EOs are complex substances comprised of hundreds of components that can vary greatly in their composition depending upon the extraction process by the producer or the origin of the plant. Thus, making it difficult to determine which pathways in the body are affected. Here, we review the published research that shows the health benefits of EOs as well as some of their adverse effects. In doing so, we show that EOs, as well as some of their individual components, possess antimicrobial, antiviral, antibiotic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties as well as purported psychogenic effects such as relieving stress, treating depression, and aiding with insomnia. Not only do we show the health benefits of using EOs, but we also indicate risks associated with their use such as their endocrine disrupting properties leading to the induction of premature breast growth in young adolescents. Taken together, there are many positive and potentially negative risks to human health associated with EOs, which make it important to bring awareness to all their known effects on the human body.

Indexed as

Oils, VolatileAromatherapyHumansMedicine, TraditionalRisk AssessmentOils, Volatileanti-inflammatoryantimicrobialEndocrine disruptorsgynecomastiaprepubertalpsychological

Identifiers

PMID32607090
PMCPMC7309671
OpenAlexW3039836517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.