ArticleInternational journal of MS care
Support Group Participation: Effect on Perceptions of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in International journal of MS care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Best practice exercise for emerging depression in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical rehabilitation · 2024Pooled it
- Perceptions of Illness Control, Coherence, and Self-Efficacy Following a Web-Based Lifestyle Program for Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Analysis of Semistructured Interviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Trial
- Developing and Piloting a Dedicated Support Group for Young Adults With Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of MS care · 2025Article
- Optimising Online Peer Support for People with Young Onset Dementia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- MS care: integrating advanced therapies and holistic management.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Online Peer Support for People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Synthesis Systematic Review.International journal of MS careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients newly diagnosed as having multiple sclerosis (MS) face an overwhelming number of questions about how it will affect their lives. Participation in a support group is one way to obtain information and receive support from others. However, existing support groups are often attended by patients with significant disability, resulting in newly diagnosed patients being hesitant to return.
methodsThis qualitative pilot study explored perceptions of patients with newly diagnosed MS before and after participation in two monthly meetings. A support group was conducted each month using nursing staff, a physician, and a social worker. Prior to the first meeting, participants were asked to complete a questionnaire with open-ended questions to share their thoughts about how MS may affect their lives. After the two meetings, they were asked to complete the same questionnaire again.
resultsEight themes were identified: uncertain disease course; insecure future; physical, emotional, and cognitive impacts; effect on relationships with family and/or spouse/significant other; ability to develop future relationship with significant other; impact on career plans; impact on ability to achieve future goals; and impact on ability to care for self and family. Five of six participants who attended both meetings and one of four who attended only the first meeting expressed a change in their perception of how MS may affect their lives.
conclusionsA support group dedicated exclusively to newly diagnosed patients may provide an opportunity for patients to experience a change in perceptions of MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.