Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32606995›Full record

ArticleHIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Biofilm-Producing

Keshav Lamichhane, Nabaraj Adhikari, Anup Bastola, Lina Devkota, Parmananda Bhandari, Binod Dhungel, Upendra Thapa Shrestha, Bipin Adhikari, Megha Raj Banjara, Komal Raj Rijal and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Distribution ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Antifungal Susceptibility andBiomedicines · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Keshav Lamichhane *Central Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-7400-4202
Nabaraj Adhikari *Central Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-5501-9011
Anup BastolaSukraraj Tropical and Infectious Disease Hospital, Teku, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0003-3624-4720
Lina DevkotaSukraraj Tropical and Infectious Disease Hospital, Teku, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-6717-2136
Parmananda BhandariSukraraj Tropical and Infectious Disease Hospital, Teku, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Binod DhungelCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Upendra Thapa ShresthaCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0001-7970-4972
Bipin AdhikariCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8981-3910
Megha Raj BanjaraCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-5024-6127
Komal Raj RijalCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0001-6281-8236
Prakash GhimireCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0003-2503-412X
Tribhuvan University · NPSukraraj Tropical & Infectious Disease Hospital · NPUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOropharyngeal candidiasis are the commonest fungal infections among HIV-positive patients. The main objective of this study was to explore biofilm-producing

methodsOropharyngeal swabs were collected from the HIV-positive patients between July and December 2019. A total of 174 oropharyngeal swabs were cultured on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA). All samples were inoculated on SDA slants supplemented with chloramphenicol and underwent incubation at 37°C for 24-48 hours. Any visible growth reported was processed for the identification of the species.

resultsAmong 174 oropharyngeal samples, 23.6% (n=41/174) of them had oropharyngeal infections and 36.6% of the oropharyngeal infections (15/41) had CD4 T-lymphocytes count below 200 cells/mm

conclusionOropharyngeal candidiasis is a common opportunistic infection among HIV-infected individuals. The majority of cases of oropharyngeal candidiasis are caused by biofilm producers

Indexed as

antifungal susceptibility testbiofilmCandida albicansHIVoral candidiasis

Identifiers

PMID32606995
PMCPMC7304782
OpenAlexW3034450634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.