Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32606926›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2020

Intercalary Allograft to Reconstruct Large-Segment Diaphysis Defects After Resection of Lower Extremity Malignant Bone Tumor.

Qing Liu, Hongbo He, Zhixi Duan, Hao Zeng, Yuhao Yuan, Zhiwei Wang, Wei Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical application of LARS tumor tube in joint function reconstruction of tumor type artificial hip replacement.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Concave-convex Reaming of Intercalary Allograft: 1-year Clinical Outcomes.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Qing LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2582-4837
Hongbo HeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Zhixi DuanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8487-3671
Hao ZengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Yuhao YuanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Zhiwei WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Wei LuoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1818-3469
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the clinical effect of intercalary allograft transplantation and reconstruction in the treatment of diaphyseal defect after resection of lower extremity malignant bone tumor.

methodsClinical data of 17 patients diagnosed with malignant lower-limb bone tumors and having undergone segmental allograft reconstruction with a mean follow-up of 49.8 (26-78) months were included. Segmental allografts of average 17-cm length preserved by deep-freezing were used and fixed using intramedullary nail, double plate, and intramedullary nail and plate combination in 2, 5, and 10 patients, respectively. Host-donor junctions were perfectly and roughly matched in 5 and 12 patients, respectively. Allograft union, local recurrence, and complications were assessed using clinical and radiological tests. Allograft union was evaluated using the International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) scoring system. The functional prognosis was evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) scoring system.

resultsIntercalary allograft reconstruction of femoral shaft, tibial shaft, and distal tibia with ankle arthrodesis was performed in eight, four, and five patients, respectively. Two patients had local recurrence and underwent amputation; one died of metastasis. Host-donor junctions in two patients showed nonunion; 12 patients achieved bone union. The average union time was 12.1 months. No allograft fracture or infection occurred. Union rates were 100% and 88.2% at metaphyseal and diaphyseal junctions, respectively. Healing time differed significantly between the precisely and roughly matched groups (p<0.01). The incidence of nonunion was higher after intramedullary nailing than after the other two methods (p<0.05). The mean MSTS score was 24.2 (14-29) at the end of follow-up.

conclusionIntercalary allograft transplantation is an effective strategy for diaphyseal defect following post-tumor resection in the lower extremity. Good bone healing after allograft reconstruction is achieved with stable internal fixation and perfectly matched host-donor interfaces.

Indexed as

bone healingintercalary allograftinternal fixationlower extremitymalignant bone tumor

Identifiers

PMID32606926
PMCPMC7292249
OpenAlexW3033328642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.