Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32606620›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2020

Satisfaction of Patients and Physicians with Treatments for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-Based Survey in China.

Nan Jiang, Pingting Yang, Shengyun Liu, Hongbin Li, Lijun Wu, Xiaofei Shi, Yongfei Fang, Yi Zhao, Jian Xu, Zhenyu Jiang and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Nan Jiang *Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5287-8593
Pingting Yang *Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China.
Shengyun Liu *Department of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hongbin LiDepartment of Rheumatology, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical College, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China.
Lijun WuDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Xiaofei ShiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Yongfei FangDepartment of Rheumatology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3221-8931
Yi ZhaoDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Jian XuDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Zhenyu JiangDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-4189-4405
Zhenbiao WuDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Xijing Hospital Affiliated to the Fourth Military Medical University, Shanxi, People's Republic of China.
Xinwang DuanDepartment of Rheumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.
Qian WangDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-4541-9898
Xinping TianDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Mengtao LiDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaofeng ZengDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNArmy Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNFirst Hospital of China Medical University · CNHenan University of Science and Technology · CNInner Mongolia Medical College Hospital · CNJilin University · CNKunming Medical University · CNNanchang University · CNPeople's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region · CNSichuan University · CNXijing Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory disease characterized by chronic destructive synovitis and possible multisystem involvement. This study aimed to survey the treatment satisfaction of physicians and patients with RA, and to explore the potential factors. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in 12 centers across China between March 2018 and April 2018. The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II was used to assess the treatment satisfaction of patients and physicians. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine the factors independently associated with treatment satisfaction of patients.

resultsThe patients' satisfaction (n=335) with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) was higher than physicians' satisfaction (n=146) regarding the side effects (95.0±14.3 vs 84.6±15.7, P<0.001) and convenience (74.6±21.2 vs 69.1±16.5, P=0.002). Among physicians, global satisfaction with bDMARDs was higher than that with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). The multivariable regression analysis showed that age was positively associated with satisfaction of patients, while college or above education and self-assessment of disease severity were inversely associated with satisfaction. Treatment satisfaction was associated positively with the quality of communication with the physician and inversely with treatment costs.

conclusionFor bDMARDs, the treatment satisfaction of patients with RA is generally higher than that of physicians'. Physicians' satisfaction with bDMARDs is higher than with csDMARDs. Age, education, disease severity, communication with the physician, and treatment costs are independently associated with the treatment satisfaction among patients. Physician-patient communication should be improved in clinical practice. Treatment costs should be taken into account when physicians make decisions.

Indexed as

patientphysicianrheumatoid arthritistreatment satisfactionTSQM-II

Identifiers

PMID32606620
PMCPMC7320887
OpenAlexW3036526638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.