Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32606443›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Developmental onset distinguishes three types of spontaneous recognition memory in mice.

Arely Cruz-Sanchez, Shadini Dematagoda, Ridda Ahmed, Sakhithya Mohanathaas, Nicole Odenwald, Maithe Arruda-Carvalho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cell-Type Specific Circuits in the Mammillary Body for Place and Object Recognition Memory.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arely Cruz-SanchezDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, M1C1A4, Canada.
Shadini DematagodaDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, M1C1A4, Canada.
Ridda AhmedDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, M1C1A4, Canada.
Sakhithya MohanathaasDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, M1C1A4, Canada.
Nicole OdenwaldDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, M1C1A4, Canada.
Maithe Arruda-CarvalhoDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, M1C1A4, Canada. m.arrudacarvalho@utoronto.ca.
The Scarborough Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous recognition memory tasks build on an animal's natural preference for novelty to assess the what, where and when components of episodic memory. Their simplicity, ethological relevance and cross-species adaptability make them extremely useful to study the physiology and pathology of memory. Recognition memory deficits are common in rodent models of neurodevelopmental disorders, and yet very little is known about the expression of spontaneous recognition memory in young rodents. This is exacerbated by the paucity of data on the developmental onset of recognition memory in mice, a major animal model of disease. To address this, we characterized the ontogeny of three types of spontaneous recognition memory in mice: object location, novel object recognition and temporal order recognition. We found that object location is the first to emerge, at postnatal day (P)21. This was followed by novel object recognition (24 h delay), at P25. Temporal order recognition was the last to emerge, at P28. Elucidating the developmental expression of recognition memory in mice is critical to improving our understanding of the ontogeny of episodic memory, and establishes a necessary blueprint to apply these tasks to probe cognitive deficits at clinically relevant time points in animal models of developmental disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsExploratory BehaviorFemaleMaleMiceRecognition, PsychologySpatial Memory

Identifiers

PMID32606443
PMCPMC7326931
OpenAlexW3040408297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.