Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32606095›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2020

Recall Efforts Successfully Increase Follow-Up for Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women With Human Papillomavirus in Honduras.

Kerry A Thomson, Manuel Sandoval, Carolyn Bain, Francesca Holme, Pooja Bansil, Jacqueline Figueroa, Silvia de Sanjosé

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kerry A ThomsonPATH, Sexual & Reproductive Health Program, Seattle, USA.
Manuel SandovalAsociación Hondureña de Planificación de Familia, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Carolyn BainPATH, Sexual & Reproductive Health Program, Seattle, USA.
Francesca HolmePATH, Sexual & Reproductive Health Program, Seattle, USA.
Pooja BansilPATH, Sexual & Reproductive Health Program, Seattle, USA.
Jacqueline FigueroaSecretary of Health, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Silvia de SanjoséPATH, Sexual & Reproductive Health Program, Seattle, USA. sdesanjose@path.org.
Sexual Health Clinic · FIHonduras Foundation for Agricultural Research · HNUniversidad Metropolitana de Honduras · HN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scaling up coverage of routine cervical screening in low-resource settings must be accompanied by efforts to retain women throughout the screening cascade and continuum of care, including adequate follow-up of abnormal results. The Scale-Up Project implemented human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical cancer screening within public-sector health facilities in Honduras between 2015 and 2019. Women who were HPV-positive but did not have visually confirmed cervical lesions upon visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA-negative) were instructed to return to the health center after 1 year for repeat HPV testing. The current evaluation assessed the effectiveness of recall strategies to prompt women to return for retesting. Clinic staff placed reminder phone calls and followed up with short message service (SMS) or home visits, if needed. We summarized number of contacts, type of contacts, and time elapsed until return to the clinic, and used log-binomial regression to identify factors associated with return to the clinic. We identified 558 women who were initially HPV-positive VIA-negative from 8 clinics as needing repeat HPV testing 1 year later. Mean age was 43.2 years. Nearly all women (98.6%) were successfully contacted and 75.1% completed repeat HPV testing. The majority of contacts (65.4%) were phone calls, and nearly half of women who returned to the clinic (42.9%) did so after 1 contact. Mean days between contact and presentation at the clinic was 10.7 (standard deviation: 14.7). Women who required 3 or more contacts were 21% less likely to return for repeat HPV testing (prevalence ratio: 0.79; 95% confidence interval=0.69,0.90;

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusCommunicationContinuity of Patient CareAcetic AcidAdultCervix UteriEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHondurasHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPatient DropoutsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAcetic Acid

Identifiers

PMID32606095
PMCPMC7326516
OpenAlexW3038773953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.