Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32606094›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2020

Evaluating the Implementation of an Intervention to Improve Postpartum Contraception in Tanzania: A Qualitative Study of Provider and Client Perspectives.

Kristy Hackett, Sarah Huber-Krum, Joel M Francis, Leigh Senderowicz, Erin Pearson, Hellen Siril, Nzovu Ulenga, Iqbal Shah

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kristy HackettDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. khackett@hsph.harvard.edu.
Sarah Huber-KrumDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Joel M FrancisManagement and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Leigh SenderowiczDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Erin PearsonTechnical Innovation and Evidence, Ipas, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Hellen SirilManagement and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Nzovu UlengaManagement and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Iqbal ShahDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard Global Health Institute · USHarvard University · USManagement and Development for Health · TZUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis qualitative study assessed implementation of the Postpartum Intrauterine Device (PPIUD) Initiative in Tanzania, a country with high rates of unintended pregnancy and low contraceptive prevalence. The PPIUD Initiative was implemented to reduce unmet need for contraception among new mothers through postpartum family planning counseling delivered during antenatal care and offering PPIUD insertion immediately following birth.

methodsWe used the implementation outcomes framework and an ecological framework to analyze in-depth interviews with providers (N=15) and women (N=47) participating in the initiative. We applied a multistage coding protocol and used thematic content analysis to identify the factors influencing implementation.

resultsBoth women and providers were enthusiastic and receptive to the PPIUD Initiative. Health system and resource constraints made adoption and fidelity to the intended intervention challenging. Many providers questioned the sustainability of the initiative, and most agreed that changes to the initiative's design (e.g., additional training opportunities, improved staffing, and availability of PPIUD supplies) would strengthen future iterations of the initiative. According to women, interpersonal aspects of care varied, with some women reporting rushed or incomplete counseling or an emphasis on the PPIUD over other methods. The perception that some providers treat older married women more favorably suggests that fidelity to the intended PPIUD Initiative was not uniformly achieved.

conclusionsStudy findings inform initiatives seeking to develop and adopt postpartum family planning programs and enhance program implementation. A comprehensive needs assessment to evaluate feasibility and identify potential adaptations for the local context is recommended. Training and supervision to improve interpersonal aspects of care, including an emphasis on patient-centered counseling, informed choice, and respectful and nondiscriminatory service delivery should be integrated into future postpartum family planning initiatives.

Indexed as

CounselingIntrauterine DevicesPostnatal CarePostpartum PeriodPrenatal CareAdolescentAdultContraceptionFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedQualitative ResearchTanzaniaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32606094
PMCPMC7326523
OpenAlexW3039610374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.