Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32606066›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Global PRoMiSe (Perioperative Recommendations for Medication Safety): protocol for a mixed-methods study.

Karen C Nanji, Alan Forbes Merry, Sofia D Shaikh, Christina Pagel, Hao Deng, Joyce A Wahr, Adrian W Gelb, Beverley A Orser

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04240301 (Global PRoMiSe), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04240301 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Global PRoMiSe (Perioperative Recommendations for Medication Safety): A Consensus-Based, Generalizable Approach

TypeobservationalSponsorKaren C. Nanji,M.D.,M.P.H.Ran2026 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsPerioperative Medication Safety
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karen C NanjiDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA KNANJI@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1347-1640
Alan Forbes MerryDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7100-009X
Sofia D ShaikhDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2015-3402
Christina PagelClinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Hao DengDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0331-2427
Joyce A WahrAnesthesiology, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9216-8382
Adrian W GelbAnesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7004-4410
Beverley A OrserDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7292-2926

Funding

Preventing Perioperative Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events Through the Use of Clinical Decision SupportK08HS024764 · AHRQ · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NANJI, KAREN C · 2016 to 2020
$793k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS024764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedication errors (MEs), which occur commonly in the perioperative period, have the potential to cause patient harm or death. Many published recommendations exist for preventing perioperative MEs; however, many of these recommendations conflict and are often not applicable to middle-income and low-income countries. The goal of this study is to develop and disseminate consensus-based recommendations for perioperative medication safety that are tailored to country income level. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The primary site of this mixed-methods study is Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School. Participants include a minimum of 108 international medication safety experts, 27 from each of the World Bank's four country income groups (high, upper-middle, lower-middle and low-income). Using the Delphi method, participants will rate the appropriateness of candidate medication safety recommendations by completing online surveys using RedCAP. We will use Condorcet ranking methods to prioritise the final recommendations for each country income group. We will execute a comprehensive dissemination strategy for the recommendations across each country income group. Finally, we will conduct semistructured interviews with our participants to evaluate the initial adoption and implementation of the recommendations in each country income group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Human Research Committee/Institutional Review Board at Partners Healthcare (2019P003567). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04240301.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, PharmacologicalDecision Support Systems, ClinicalAnesthesiaConsensusGuidelines as TopicHumansIncomeMedication ErrorsPerioperative CareQuality ControlSurveys and QuestionnairesBiomarkers, Pharmacologicaladult anaesthesiahealth & safetyprotocols & guidelinesquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID32606066
PMCPMC7328805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.