Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32606059›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Effect of reactive balance training on physical fitness poststroke: study protocol for a randomised non-inferiority trial.

Azadeh Barzideh, Susan Marzolini, Cynthia Danells, David Jagroop, Andrew H Huntley, Elizabeth L Inness, Sunita Mathur, George Mochizuki, Paul Oh, Avril Mansfield

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04042961 (Effect of Reactive Balance Training on Physical Fitness Post-stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04042961 naterminatednot on this map

Effect of Reactive Balance Training on Physical Fitness Post-stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorToronto Rehabilitation InstituteRan2019 to 2025Enrolled28ConditionsCVA (Cerebrovascular Accident)ArmsReactive balance training, Aerobic and strength training (AST)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. I-BaR: integrated balance rehabilitation framework.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Azadeh BarzidehRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Susan MarzoliniToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cynthia DanellsToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David JagroopToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew H HuntleyToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Elizabeth L InnessToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sunita MathurToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
George MochizukiKinesiology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paul OhToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Avril MansfieldToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada avril.mansfield@uhn.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0396-5815
University Health Network · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAYork University · CA

Funding

CIHR MSH-141983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRegular exercise is essential in the chronic phase of stroke recovery for improving or maintaining function, and reducing the risk of a second stroke. To achieve these goals, multiple components of fitness should be targeted with poststroke exercise, including aerobic capacity, strength and balance. However, following the recommended frequency and duration of each component separately can take a long time and lead to fatigue in people with stroke. Therefore, finding types of exercise that target multiple components of fitness all together is valuable.Reactive balance training (RBT) is a novel type of exercise where individuals repeatedly lose their balance in order to practise balance reactions. When people do RBT, they increase their heart rate and exert forces with their leg muscles which could improve aerobic fitness and muscle strength, respectively. This means that RBT could have the potential to improve multiple components of fitness, simultaneously. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial with internal pilot study. Participants with chronic stroke will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) RBT or (2) aerobic and strength training (AST). Participants in both groups will complete 1 hour of exercise, three times/week for 12 weeks. The primary objective is to determine the effect of RBT on aerobic capacity and knee muscles' strength. The secondary objective is to determine the effects of RBT and AST on balance control and balance confidence. We expect to find that RBT is superior to AST in terms of improving balance control and balance confidence, yet not inferior to AST in terms of its effects on aerobic capacity and strength. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics approval has been received. Results will be disseminated directly to study participants at the end of the trial, and to other stakeholders via publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04042961.

Indexed as

ExercisePhysical Conditioning, HumanPhysical FitnessPostural BalanceResistance TrainingAdultAgedEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStroke Rehabilitationrehabilitation medicinesports medicinestroke

Identifiers

PMID32606059
PMCPMC7328813
OpenAlexW3038405127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.