Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32605866›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2020

Human Papillomavirus Immunization in Rural Primary Care.

Rose Gunn, Laura K Ferrara, Caitlin Dickinson, Isabel Stock, Jennifer Griffith-Weprin, Amy Wiser, Brigit Hatch, L J Fagnan, Patricia A Carney, Melinda M Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rose GunnOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
Laura K FerraraOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
Caitlin DickinsonOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
Isabel StockOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
Jennifer Griffith-WeprinSchool of Nursing, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
Amy WiserDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
Brigit HatchDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
L J FagnanOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
Patricia A CarneyDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
Melinda M DavisOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: davismel@ohsu.edu.

Funding

Using Context to Improve Implementation of Evidenced-based Interventions for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Primary Care (Precise CRC)K07CA211971 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, MELINDA MARIE · 2017 to 2020
$683k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA211971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the safety and efficacy of the human papillomavirus vaccine, thousands are impacted by human papillomavirus and its related cancers. Rural regions have disproportionately low rates of human papillomavirus vaccination. Primary care clinics play an important role in delivering the human papillomavirus vaccine. A positive deviance approach is used to identify workflows, organizational factors, and communication strategies in rural clinics with higher human papillomavirus vaccine up-to-date rates. Positive deviance is a process by which exceptional behaviors and strategies are identified to understand factors that enable success.

methodsRural primary care clinics were rank ordered by human papillomavirus vaccine up-to-date rates using 2018 Oregon Immunization Program data, then recruited via purposive sampling of clinics in the top and bottom quartiles. Two study team members conducted previsit interviews, intake surveys, and 2-day observation visits with 12 clinics and prepared detailed field notes. Data were collected October-December 2018 and analyzed using a thematic approach January-April 2019.

resultsFour themes distinguished rural clinics with higher human papillomavirus vaccine up-to-date rates from those with lower rates. First, they implemented standardized workflows to identify patients due for the vaccine and had vaccine administration protocols. Second, they designated and supported a vaccine champion. Third, clinical staff in higher performing sites were comfortable providing immunizations regardless of visit type. Finally, they used clear, persuasive language to recommend or educate parents and patients about the vaccine's importance.

conclusionsPositive deviance identified characteristics associated with higher human papillomavirus vaccine up-to-date rates in rural primary care clinics. These findings provide guidance for rural clinics to inform human papillomavirus vaccination quality improvement interventions.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesHumansImmunization ProgramsOregonPrimary Health CareRural HealthVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID32605866
PMCPMC7483409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.