SynthesisEuropean urology focus2021
Use of Duloxetine for Postprostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in European urology focus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of treatment options for post-prostatectomy incontinence.World journal of urology · 2022Pooled it
- Comparative analysis of male stress urinary incontinence treatments: A review of efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes.Current urology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic efficacy of suburethral sling in treatment of neurogenic and non-neurogenic stress urinary incontinence in men.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Breaking barriers in stress urinary incontinence care: TAS-303 as a game-changer in pharmacological innovation.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Simultaneous implant of inflatable penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter: a single high-volume center experience.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Article
- Drug Repurposing as an Effective Drug Discovery Strategy: A Critical Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
- Stress Urinary Incontinence: An Unsolved Clinical Challenge.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Article
- Current Opinions about the Use of Duloxetine: Results from a Survey Aimed at Psychiatrists.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Latest Evidence on Post-Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Mixed urinary incontinence: Are there effective treatments?Neurourology and urodynamics · 2023Article
- A methodologic survey on use of the GRADE approach in evidence syntheses published in high-impact factor urology and nephrology journals.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe recommended treatment of postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (PPSUI) after failure of pelvic floor muscle training is primarily surgical intervention with a male sling or artificial urinary sphincter. The use of pharmacological therapy in this setting is unlicensed and controversial.
objectiveTo systematically review the available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of duloxetine for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence following prostate surgery (radical or endoscopic). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception up until April 17, 2020. All studies evaluating the role of duloxetine in men with PPSUI were included. Two reviewers independently screened all articles, searched the reference lists of retrieved articles, and performed data extraction. The quality of evidence and risk of bias were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE); Cochrane; and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The search yielded 234 studies. After excluding duplicates, 140 titles and abstracts were screened, and eight reports (348 patients) were eligible for inclusion in the final review. Duloxetine was assessed in two scenarios: (1) early use to reduce the time to attain continence and (2) treatment of persistent PPSUI. Most men had mild-to-moderate incontinence at baseline. Overall, duloxetine resulted in a mean dry rate of 58% (25-89%), mean improvement in pad number of 61% (12-100%), and mean improvement in 1-h pad weight of 68% (53-90%) at short-term follow-up (mean 1-9 mo; low to moderate certainty of evidence). However, mean adverse event rates were relatively high, and treatment was discontinued in 38% (low certainty of evidence).
conclusionsDuloxetine has demonstrated good short-term cure and/or improvement in treating men with persistent PPSUI, as well as in reducing the time to attain continence. However, a proportion of men discontinue treatment due to adverse events. The overall certainty evidence is moderate to low, with heterogeneity between studies and methodological limitations. However, we have highlighted the need for further randomised trials with longer follow-up, utilising consistent outcome reporting measures. Despite these limitations, the findings from this review will aid patient counselling regarding this less invasive treatment option, thereby allowing personalisation of care centred around the values and preferences of individual patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: Duloxetine has good success rates in the short term, in terms of improving incontinence symptoms in men who have undergone prostate surgery. However, some men experience side effects bad enough to require cessation of treatment. Further studies are needed to determine whether duloxetine maintains its effectiveness in the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.