Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32605730›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2020

Impact of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) on training and well-being in subspecialty surgery: A national survey of cardiothoracic trainees in the United Kingdom.

Edward J Caruana, Akshay Patel, Simon Kendall, Sridhar Rathinam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Safe Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Current obesity reports · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Junior doctors' mental health and coronavirus disease safety concerns.Australian and New Zealand journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edward J CaruanaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: edwardcaruana@nhs.net.
Akshay PatelInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Simon KendallDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesborough, United Kingdom.
Sridhar RathinamDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has overwhelmed health care systems and disrupted routine care internationally. Health care workers face disruption to their work routines and professional development, as well as an elevated risk of infection and morbidity. We sought to establish the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the well-being, practice, and progression of all trainees in cardiothoracic surgery in the United Kingdom.

methodsA 31-item questionnaire was designed, validated, and disseminated via e-mail and an instant-messaging platform.

resultsIn total, 76 (of 118, 64%) cardiothoracic surgical trainees responded, representing all training grades and programs nationally; 48 (63%) and 24 (32%) were concerned about their physical and mental health, respectively, 25 (33%) had taken time off work due to COVID-19, 65 (86%) had treated patients with COVID-19, 36 of whom (55%) were wearing satisfactory personal protective equipment at the time, 41 (54%) remain concerned about personal protective equipment provision at their institution, 42 (55%) had been redeployed to cover other specialties, and 23 (30%) had encountered ethical dilemmas related to care of patients. There was a significant impact on time spent in outpatient clinics (44% reduction), multidisciplinary team meetings (79% reduction), and operating theaters (78% reduction). In total, 67 (88%) of respondents were concerned about the impact on their training, and 54 (71%) felt that the deviation may require an extension in their planned training time.

conclusionsThe duration and impact of the current pandemic is, as yet, uncertain. Timely sharing of experiences, concerns, and expectations will inform health care and education policy and influence practice in the pandemic era and beyond.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsEducation, Medical, GraduatePandemicsPneumonia, ViralAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19HumansOccupational HealthOccupational StressSARS-CoV-2Students, MedicalSurgeonsSurveys and QuestionnairesThoracic SurgeryCOVID-19medical educationpandemicresidencysurgical educationtraining

Identifiers

PMID32605730
PMCPMC7262521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.