ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2020
Coronary Stent Thrombosis- Predictors and Prevention.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adjunctive therapeutic strategy for in-stent thrombosis:RSC advances · 2026Article
- Risk factor analysis and machine learning-based prediction model for type 4b acute myocardial infarction induced by very late stent thrombosis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Case Report: Unusual persistent elevation of troponin I-systemic sclerosis masked by acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Comparison of different interventional treatment strategies for patients with type 4b acute myocardial infarction caused by very late stent thrombosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Patient-tailored stent: Are we there yet?Cardiology journal · 2025Review
- Stent thrombosis: a contemporary guide to definitions, risk factors, and management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Platelets, Biomarkers of Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, and Early Coronary Stent Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Role of Coronary Imaging in Chronic Total Occlusions: Applications and Future Possibilities.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Challenges and Advances in Interventional Cardiology for Coronary Artery Disease Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Sutureless vascular anastomotic approaches and their potential impacts.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- The Inhibitory Effect of Platelet Aggregation Ability Assessed by the Platelet Aggregatory Threshold Index in a Patient with Recurrent Stent Thrombosis.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome-propensity score matching analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Association of Periprocedural Inflammatory Activation With Increased Risk for Early Coronary Stent Thrombosis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Five-year outcomes of double kissing mini-culotte stenting vs. mini-culotte stenting using drug-eluting stents for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Patient-Related Factors Predicting Stent Thrombosis in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Research on the Current Application Status of Magnesium Metal Stents in Human Luminal Cavities.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Review
- Clinical and Procedural Outcomes of IVUS-Guided vs. Angiography-Guided CTO-PCI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Concurrent Pacemaker Lead Perforation and Subacute Coronary Stent Thrombosis: A Case Report.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStent thrombosis (ST) is a dreaded complication after stent implantation and is associated with a mortality between 5% and 45%. The mechanisms by which ST arises are complex. Because of the seriousness of this situation, all phy - sicians should have at least basic knowledge of it. In this article, we present the risk factors for ST and discuss some innovative approaches to its treatment.
methodsThis review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, and on current international guidelines and expert recommendations.
resultsThe frequency of ST has been markedly lowered by technical advances in coronary stenting and by the implementation of modern implantation techniques, including the introduction of coverage with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Both patient-related risk factors and procedural aspects can elevate the risk of ST. The independent risk factors for ST include premature termination of DAPT (hazard ratio [HR] 26.8; 95% confidence interval [8.4; 85.4]; p <0.0001), malignant disease (odds ratio [OR]: 17.45; [4.67; 65.26]; p <0.0001), and diabetes mellitus (OR: 3.14; [1.33; 7.45]; p = 0.0093). In comparison to angiographically guided procedures, the use of intracoronary imaging techniques in patients with acute coronary syndrome lowers the frequency of ST (0.6% versus 1.2%; p = 0.005). These techniques enable the detection of many findings in the coronary arteries that are associated with the development of ST. In such cases, countermeasures such as secondary stent dilatation or prolongation of DAPT can help prevent ST.
conclusionAs the pathophysiology of ST is multifactorial, research in this area presents a special challenge. Prospective clinical trials will be needed to determine whether the systematic use of imaging techniques can lower the frequency of ST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.