Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32605672›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2020

Public health interventions to improve maternal nutrition during pregnancy: a nationally representative study of iron and folic acid consumption and food supplements in India.

Prashant Kumar Singh, Ritam Dubey, Lucky Singh, Chandan Kumar, Rajesh Kumar Rai, Shalini Singh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prashant Kumar SinghDivision of Preventive Oncology, ICMR National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Noida, India.
Ritam DubeyDivision of Preventive Oncology, ICMR National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Noida, India.
Lucky SinghICMR National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi110 029, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2590-6135
Chandan KumarDepartment of Policy Studies, TERI School of Advanced Studies, New Delhi, India.
Rajesh Kumar RaiSociety for Health and Demographic Surveillance, Suri, West Bengal, India.
Shalini SinghICMR National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Noida, India.
National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research · INNational Institute of Medical Statistics · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite a reduction in maternal mortality in recent years, a high rate of anaemia and other nutrient inadequacies during pregnancy pose a serious threat to mothers and their children in the Global South. Using the framework of the WHO-Commission on Social Determinants of Health, this study examines the socioeconomic, programmatic and contextual factors associated with the consumption of iron and folic acid (IFA) tablets/syrup for at least 100 d (IFA100) and receiving supplementary food (SF) by pregnant women in India.

designWe analysed a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of over 190 898 ever-married women aged 15-49 years who were interviewed as part of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) conducted during 2015-16, who had at least one live birth preceding 5 years of the survey.

settingAll twenty-nine states and seven union territories of India.

participantsEver-married women aged 15-49 years.

resultsLess than one-third of women were found to be consuming IFA100, and a little over half received SF during their last pregnancy. The consumption of IFA100 was likely to improve with women's education, household wealth, early and more prenatal visits, and in a community with high pregnancy registration. Higher parity, early and more prenatal visits, contact with community health workers during pregnancy, belonging to a poor household and living in an aggregated poor community and rural area positively determine whether a woman might receive SF during pregnancy.

conclusionsContinuous monitoring and evaluation of provisioning IFA and SF in targeted groups and communities is a key to expanding the coverage and reducing the burden of undernutrition during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyPrenatal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPublic HealthAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDietary SupplementsFemaleFolic AcidHealth PromotionHumansIndiaIronMiddle AgedPregnancyYoung AdultFolic AcidIronAnaemiaFood supplementsIndiaIron and folic acidMaternal nutritionSocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID32605672
PMCPMC10200584
OpenAlexW3039371471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.