Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32605665›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of laryngology and otology2020

Reusable respirators as personal protective equipment during ENT surgery.

B Patel, J C Hardman, W Yang, A Robson, G Putnam, A George, V Paleri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of laryngology and otology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimizing Airway Surgery in COVID 19 Era.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  2. Diagnostic and surgical innovations in otolaryngology for adult and paediatric patients during the COVID-19 era.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Innovations in otorhinolaryngology in the age of COVID-19: a systematic literature review.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

B PatelHead and Neck Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J C HardmanHead and Neck Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
W YangHead and Neck Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
A RobsonDepartment of ENT, North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Carlisle, UK.
G PutnamDepartment of ENT, North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Carlisle, UK.
A GeorgeDepartment of Head and Neck, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
V PaleriHead and Neck Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobust personal protective equipment is essential in preventing the transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 to head and neck surgeons who are routinely involved in aerosol generating procedures.

objectiveThis paper describes the collective experience, across 3 institutes, of using a reusable half-face respirator in 72 head and neck surgery cases.

methodCost analysis was performed to demonstrate the financial implications of using a reusable respirator compared to single-use filtering facepiece code 3 masks.

conclusionThe reusable respirator is a cost-effective alternative to disposable filtering facepiece code 3 respirators. Supplying reusable respirators to individual staff members may increase the likelihood of them having appropriate personal protective equipment during their clinical duties.

Indexed as

AerosolsBetacoronavirusBody FluidsCoronavirus InfectionsCost-Benefit AnalysisCOVID-19Equipment DesignEquipment ReuseFemaleHumansMaleOccupational ExposureOtolaryngologyOtorhinolaryngologic Surgical ProceduresPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentAerosolsCommunicationCost-Benefit AnalysisCOVID-19Personal Protective Equipment

Identifiers

PMID32605665
PMCPMC7399154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.