Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32605651›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2020

Identification of cell type-specific methylation signals in bulk whole genome bisulfite sequencing data.

C Anthony Scott, Jack D Duryea, Harry MacKay, Maria S Baker, Eleonora Laritsky, Chathura J Gunasekara, Cristian Coarfa, Robert A Waterland

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Uncovering alterations in cancer epigenetics via trans-dimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo and hidden Markov models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Animal cells and systems · 2023
    Article
  11. Methylome Imputation by Methylation Patterns.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

C Anthony ScottDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jack D DuryeaDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Harry MacKayDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Maria S BakerDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Eleonora LaritskyDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Chathura J GunasekaraDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Cristian CoarfaDepartment of Molecular & Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. coarfa@bcm.edu.
Robert A WaterlandDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Houston, TX, USA. waterland@bcm.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7401-3408

Funding

Epigenetic Mechanisms and Developmental Actions of Leptin in the HypothalamusR01DK111831 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SIMERLY, RICHARD B, WATERLAND, ROBERT A · 2017 to 2020
$2.4M
Epigenetic variation at metastable epialleles: Effects on human obesityR01DK111522 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI COARFA, CRISTIAN, WATERLAND, ROBERT A · 2017 to 2020
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS 1R01DK111522NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK111831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe traditional approach to studying the epigenetic mechanism CpG methylation in tissue samples is to identify regions of concordant differential methylation spanning multiple CpG sites (differentially methylated regions). Variation limited to single or small numbers of CpGs has been assumed to reflect stochastic processes. To test this, we developed software, Cluster-Based analysis of CpG methylation (CluBCpG), and explored variation in read-level CpG methylation patterns in whole genome bisulfite sequencing data.

resultsAnalysis of both human and mouse whole genome bisulfite sequencing datasets reveals read-level signatures associated with cell type and cell type-specific biological processes. These signatures, which are mostly orthogonal to classical differentially methylated regions, are enriched at cell type-specific enhancers and allow estimation of proportional cell composition in synthetic mixtures and improved prediction of gene expression. In tandem, we developed a machine learning algorithm, Precise Read-Level Imputation of Methylation (PReLIM), to increase coverage of existing whole genome bisulfite sequencing datasets by imputing CpG methylation states on individual sequencing reads. PReLIM both improves CluBCpG coverage and performance and enables identification of novel differentially methylated regions, which we independently validate.

conclusionsOur data indicate that, rather than stochastic variation, read-level CpG methylation patterns in tissue whole genome bisulfite sequencing libraries reflect cell type. Accordingly, these new computational tools should lead to an improved understanding of epigenetic regulation by DNA methylation.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationSoftwareWhole Genome SequencingAdultAgedAnimalsCellsComputational BiologyCpG IslandsFemaleGene ExpressionHumansMachine LearningMaleMiceOrgan SpecificityBisulfite-seqDeconvolutionDNA methylationImputationMachine learningRandom forestsRead-levelWGBS

Identifiers

PMID32605651
PMCPMC7329512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.