Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32605623›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2020

Expanding the 3 Wishes Project for compassionate end-of-life care: a qualitative evaluation of local adaptations.

Meredith Vanstone, Thanh H Neville, Marilyn E Swinton, Marina Sadik, France J Clarke, Allana LeBlanc, Benjamin Tam, Alyson Takaoka, Neala Hoad, Jennifer Hancock and 7 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04147169 completednot on this map

Compassionate End of Life Care in the ICU: Evaluating the Value, Transferability, Affordability, and Sustainability and Value of the 3 Wishes Project

TypeobservationalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled730ConditionsDeath, Communication, Multidisciplinary, Empathy, CompassionArmsFocused end-of-life conversations to promote connections among patients, family members and clinicians.
NCT06277310 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Personalized End of Life Care in Safety-Net Hospitals: Implementation of the 3 Wishes Project

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2024 to 2028Enrolled900ConditionsEnd of LifeArms3 Wishes Project
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Meredith VanstoneDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-6259
Thanh H NevilleDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, University of California Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, USA.
Marilyn E SwintonDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Marina SadikDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
France J ClarkeDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Allana LeBlancVancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Benjamin TamDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Alyson TakaokaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Neala HoadDepartment of Critical Care, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer HancockDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Sarah McMullenDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Brenda ReeveDepartment of Medicine, Brantford General Hospital, Brantford, Ontario, Canada.
William DechertBrantford General Hospital, Brantford, Ontario, Canada.
Orla M SmithCritical Care Department, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gyan SandhuCritical Care Department, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Julie LockingtonVancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Deborah J CookDepartments of Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. debcook@mcmaster.ca.
Impact · CAMcMaster University · CADalhousie University · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAVancouver Coastal Health · CASt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Canadian Intensive Care Foundation N/ACSU Institute for Palliative Care N/AGreenwall Foundation N/AHamilton Academy of Health Sciences Organization N/AKatz Family Foundation N/ANova Scotia Health Authority N/APerlman Family Foundation N/APhysicians' Services Incorporated Foundation N/APorath Family Charitable Foundation N/AVITAS Healthcare N/AWirtschafter Family Foundation N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 3 Wishes Project (3WP) is an end-of-life program that honors the dignity of dying patients by fostering meaningful connections among patients, families, and clinicians. Since 2013, it has become embedded in the culture of end-of-life care in over 20 ICUs across North America. The purpose of the current study is to describe the variation in implementation of 3WP across sites, in order to ascertain which factors facilitated multicenter implementation, which factors remain consistent across sites, and which may be adapted to suit local needs.

methodsUsing the methodology of qualitative description, we collected interview and focus group data from 85 clinicians who participated in the successful initiation and sustainment of 3WP in 9 ICUs. We describe the transition between different models of 3WP implementation, from core clinical program to the incorporation of various research activities. We describe various sources of financial and in-kind resources accessed to support the program.

resultsBeyond sharing a common goal of improving end-of-life care, sites varied considerably in organizational context, staff complement, and resources. Despite these differences, the program was successfully implemented at each site and eventually evolved from a clinical or research intervention to a general approach to end-of-life care. Key to this success was flexibility and the empowerment of frontline staff to tailor the program to address identified needs with available resources. This adaptability was fueled by cross-pollination of ideas within and outside of each site, resulting in the establishment of a network of like-minded individuals with a shared purpose.

conclusionsThe successful initiation and sustainment of 3WP relied on local adaptations to suit organizational needs and resources. The semi-structured nature of the program facilitated these adaptations, encouraged creative and important ways of relating within local clinical cultures, and reinforced the main tenet of the program: meaningful human connection at the end of life. Local adaptations also encouraged a team approach to care, supplementing the typical patient-clinician dyad by explicitly empowering the healthcare team to collectively recognize and respond to the needs of dying patients, families, and each other.

trial registrationNCT04147169 , retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov on October 31, 2019.

Indexed as

EmpathyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchTerminal CareEmpathyEnd of life careIntensive care unitProgram evaluationQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32605623
PMCPMC7325646
OpenAlexW3038265539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.