Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32605616›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

The impact of limb loading and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on the measurement of the limb loading dependent lower extremity parameters.

Lukas Jud, Tabitha Roth, Philipp Fürnstahl, Lazaros Vlachopoulos, Reto Sutter, Sandro F Fucentese

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Increased femoral curvature and trochlea flexion in high-grade patellofemoral dysplastic knees.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lukas JudDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland. lukas.jud@balgrist.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8128-3927
Tabitha RothInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Philipp FürnstahlResearch in Orthopedic Computer Science (ROCS), Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lazaros VlachopoulosDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland.
Reto SutterDepartment of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sandro F FucenteseDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 182352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeformity assessment and preoperative planning of realignment surgery are conventionally based on weight-bearing (WB) radiographs. However, newer technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning and surgical navigation with patient-specific instruments (PSI) rely on non-weight bearing (NWB) computed tomography (CT) data. Additionally, differences between conventional two-dimensional (2D) and 3D measurements are known. The goal of the present study was to systematically analyse the influence of WB and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on common WB-dependent measurements used for deformity assessment.

methods85 lower limbs could be included. Two readers measured the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) in 2D WB and 2D NWB radiographs, as well as in CT-reconstructed 3D models using an already established 3D measurement method for HKA, and a newly developed 3D measurement method for JLCA, respectively. Interrater and intermodality reliability was assessed.

resultsSignificant differences between WB and NWB measurements were found for HKA (p < 0.001) and JLCA (p < 0.001). No significant difference could be observed between 2D HKA NWB and 3D HKA (p = 0.09). The difference between 2D JLCA NWB and 3D JLCA was significant (p < 0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the interrater agreement was almost perfect for all HKA and 3D JLCA measurements and substantial for 2D JLCA WB and 2D JLCA NWB. ICC for the intermodality agreement was almost perfect between 2D HKA WB and 2D HKA NWB as well as between 2D HKA NWB and 3D HKA, whereas it was moderate between 2D JLCA WB and 2D JLCA NWB and between 2D JLCA NWB and 3D JLCA.

conclusionLimb loading results in significant differences for both HKA and JLCA measurements. Furthermore, 2D projections were found to be insufficient to represent 3D joint anatomy in complex cases. With an increasing number of surgical approaches based on NWB CT-reconstructed models, research should focus on the development of 3D planning methods that consider the effects of WB on leg alignment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLimb Deformities, CongenitalLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedModels, AnatomicOsteotomyRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsSurgery, Computer-AssistedSwitzerlandTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputer-assisted surgeryCorrective osteotomyLeg deformityNavigationOsteotomyThree-dimensional planning

Identifiers

PMID32605616
PMCPMC7329436
OpenAlexW3038511176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.