SynthesisBMC public health2020
Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
146 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interventions to Enhance COVID-19 Pandemic Health Literacy in Health Professionals: Systematic Review.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of healthcare professional-delivered health literacy interventions on patient reported outcomes in cancer patients - a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Health literacy and patient outcomes in acute care surgery: A systematic review.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Is Primary Care Patient Experience Associated with Provider-Patient Language Concordance and Use of Interpreters for Spanish-preferring Patients: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Pooled it
- The Effect of Health Literacy Interventions on Self-management in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based interventions aimed at improving health literacy of parents/carers of children.Perspectives in public health · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review and narrative synthesis of health literacy interventions among Spanish speaking populations in the United States.BMC public health · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of health literacy interventions aimed to improve health gains of higher education students-a systematic review.BMC public health · 2024Pooled it
- Interventions to promote health literacy among working-age populations experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage: systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2024Pooled it
- The role of health literacy in intervention studies targeting children living with overweight or obesity and their parents-a systematic mixed methods review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Characteristics of participants who take up screening tests for diabetes and lipid disorders: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- Association of Health Insurance Literacy with Health Care Utilization: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Visual-Based Interventions on Understanding Cancer Information: A Systematic Review.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- Trial
- Improving health literacy of patients with pulmonary embolism through evidence-based health information: a feasibility study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- The Feasibility and Acceptability of an App-Based Intervention Aimed at Improving Maternal Health Literacy Regarding Infant Play and Development: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of audio-visual health educational materials on CPAP adherence: the AHEAD trial.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022Trial
- Digital Health Information Use, Trust, and Language-Related Disparities in Health Literacy in South Tyrol, Italy: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Building health-literate artificial intelligence.Nature human behaviour · 2026Review
86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe primary aim of this review was to establish whether health literacy interventions, in adults, are effective for improving health literacy. Two secondary aims assessed the impact of health literacy interventions on health behaviours and whether health literacy interventions have been conducted in cardiovascular patients.
methodsA systematic review (Prospero registration: CRD42018110772) with no start date running through until April 2020. Eligible studies were conducted in adults and included a pre/post measure of health literacy. Medline, Embase, Eric, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Psychology and Behavioural Science, HMIC, Web of Science, Scopus, Social Care Online, NHS Scotland Journals, Social Policy and Practice, and Global Health were searched. Two thousand one hundred twenty-seven papers were assessed, and 57 full text papers screened to give 22 unique datasets from 23 papers. Risk of bias was assessed regarding randomisation, allocation sequence concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting and other biases. Intervention reporting quality was assessed using the TIDieR checklist.
resultsTwenty-two studies were included reporting on 10,997 participants in nine countries. The majority of studies (14/22) were published in 2018 or later. Eight studies (n = 1268 participants) also reported on behavioural outcomes. Health literacy interventions resulted in improvements in at least some aspect of health literacy in 15/22 studies (n = 10,180 participants) and improved behavioural outcomes in 7/8 studies (n = 1209 participants). Only two studies were conducted with cardiovascular patients. All studies were at risk of bias with 18 judged as high risk. In addition, there was poor reporting of intervention content with little explication of the theoretical basis for the interventions.
conclusionsHealth literacy interventions can improve health literacy and can also lead to changes in health behaviours. Health literacy interventions offer a way to improve outcomes for populations most at risk of health inequalities. Health literacy is a developing field with very few interventions using clear theoretical frameworks. Closer links between health literacy and behaviour change theories and frameworks could result in higher quality and more effective interventions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: Prospero registration: CRD42018110772.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.