ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020
Women's experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linguistic manoeuvres: obstetric violence camouflages harm and loss of consent from birth.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Article
- 'They just told me to go to theatre': women's experiences and support needs following emergency caesarean section in Kawempe National referral hospital, Uganda.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring barriers and facilitators of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), awareness, and preferences among females in Western Saudi Arabia.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Understanding the complex function of gut microbiota: its impact on the pathogenesis of obesity and beyond: a comprehensive review.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2024Review
- Effect of continuity of team midwifery care on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a quasi-experimental study in Iran.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Dehumanized, Violated, and Powerless: An Australian Survey of Women's Experiences of Obstetric Violence in the Past 5 Years.Violence against women · 2024Article
- A content analysis of women's experiences of different models of maternity care: the Birth Experience Study (BESt).BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- "I was able to take it back": Seeking VBAC after experiencing dehumanizing maternity care in a primary cesarean.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2023Article
- Influence of organizational factors on the offer and success rate of a trial of labor after cesarean section in Belgium: an ecological study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Feeling anxious'- women's experiences of having a baby in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic using the Voqual real time app.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- What women want if they were to have another baby: the Australian Birth Experience Study (BESt) cross-sectional national survey.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Vaginal birth after cesarean section: A quantitative study exploring women's understanding and experience regarding VBAC rates in Greece.European journal of midwifery · 2023Article
- Exploring health care professionals' experiences and knowledge of woman-centred care in a university hospital.PloS one · 2023Article
- Assessing Dutch women's experiences of labour and birth: adaptations and psychometric evaluations of the measures Mothers on Autonomy in Decision Making Scale, Mothers on Respect Index, and Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- From coercion to respectful care: women's interactions with health care providers when planning a VBAC.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Inequities in quality perinatal care in the United States during pregnancy and birth after cesarean.PloS one · 2022Article
- Risk management of vaginal birth after cesarean section (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
- Experiences of Quality Perinatal Care During the US COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2021Article
- "I had to fight for my VBAC": A mixed methods exploration of women's experiences of pregnancy and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is a safe mode of birth for most women but internationally VBAC rates remain low. In Australia women planning a VBAC may experience different models of care including continuity of care (CoC). There are a limited number of studies exploring the impact and influence of CoC on women's experiences of planning a VBAC. Continuity of care (CoC) with a midwife has been found to increase spontaneous vaginal birth and decrease some interventions. Women planning a VBAC prefer and benefit from CoC with a known care provider. This study aimed to explore the influence, and impact, of continuity of care on women's experiences when planning a VBAC in Australia.
methodsThe Australian VBAC survey was designed and distributed via social media. Outcomes and experiences of women who had planned a VBAC in the past 5 years were compared by model of care. Standard fragmented maternity care was compared to continuity of care with a midwife or doctor.
resultsIn total, 490 women completed the survey and respondents came from every State and Territory in Australia. Women who had CoC with a midwife were more likely to feel in control of their decision making and feel their health care provider positively supported their decision to have a VBAC. Women who had CoC with a midwife were more likely to have been active in labour, experience water immersion and have an upright birthing position. Women who received fragmented care experienced lower autonomy and lower respect compared to CoC.
conclusionThis study recruited a non-probability based, self-selected, sample of women using social media. Women found having a VBAC less traumatic than their previous caesarean and women planning a VBAC benefited from CoC models, particularly midwifery continuity of care. Women seeking VBAC are often excluded from these models as they are considered to have risk factors. There needs to be a focus on increasing shared belief and confidence in VBAC across professions and an expansion of midwifery led continuity of care models for women seeking a VBAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.