ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Impact of a Soil Conditioner Integrated into Fertilization Scheme on Orange and Lemon Seedling Physiological Performances.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growers in Florida face unique challenges regarding maintaining proper citrus nutrition.Poor draining soils with low fertility, low C.E.C., and high rates of leaching are common in thisregion. In response to these challenges, interest has grown in products labeled as soil conditioners.Using a completely randomized experimental design, this greenhouse study tested the effects of 5different combinations of a traditional fertilizer (TF) and a new soil conditioner (SC) on lemon andorange seedling physiology. Eight-month-old 'Bearss' lemon and 'Valencia' sweet orange graftedon sour orange rootstocks were employed, and five repetitions were used for each treatment. Plantbiomass (dry weight), height, stem diameter, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance andnutrient uptake were analyzed after 120 days of treatment. The results show that SC has a positiveimpact upon both chlorophyll levels and stomatal conductance values in both orange and lemonseedlings. However, based on dry weight growth data, we can only conclude that the SC waseffective for orange seedlings at 50% TF and 0.5% SC. Based on this short 120-day evaluation, theSC achieved positive growth promotion for orange (50% TF) but not for lemon seedlings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.