Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32605256›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Emotion Recognition in Cats.

Angelo Quaranta, Serenella d'Ingeo, Rosaria Amoruso, Marcello Siniscalchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Rats respond to aversive emotional arousal of human handlers with the activation of the basolateral and central amygdala.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angelo QuarantaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Physiology and Behavior Unit, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.
Serenella d'IngeoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Physiology and Behavior Unit, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.
Rosaria AmorusoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Physiology and Behavior Unit, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.
Marcello SiniscalchiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Physiology and Behavior Unit, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies demonstrated that cats form social bonds with both conspecifics and humans. One of the key factors regulating social interactions is the transfer of emotions between the individuals. The present study aimed at investigating cats' spontaneous ability to match acoustic and visual signals for the recognition of both conspecific and human emotions. Different conspecific (cat "purr" and "hiss") and heterospecific (human "happiness" and "anger") emotional stimuli were presented to the tested population using a cross-modal paradigm. Results showed that cats are able to cross-modally match pictures of emotional faces with their related vocalizations, particularly for emotions of high intensity. Overall, our findings demonstrate that cats have a general mental representation of the emotions of their social partners, both conspecifics and humans.

Indexed as

animal welfarebehaviorcatemotionphysiology

Identifiers

PMID32605256
PMCPMC7401521
OpenAlexW3037065736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.