Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32605126›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Biomarkers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives.

Stefania Cocco, Michela Piezzo, Alessandra Calabrese, Daniela Cianniello, Roberta Caputo, Vincenzo Di Lauro, Giuseppina Fusco, Germira di Gioia, Marina Licenziato, Michelino De Laurentiis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stefania CoccoIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli NA, Italy.
Michela PiezzoIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli NA, Italy.
Alessandra CalabreseIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli NA, Italy.
Daniela CiannielloIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli NA, Italy.
Roberta CaputoIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli NA, Italy.
Vincenzo Di LauroIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli NA, Italy.
Giuseppina FuscoIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli NA, Italy.
Germira di GioiaIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli NA, Italy.
Marina LicenziatoIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli NA, Italy.
Michelino De LaurentiisIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Napoli NA, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9009-1572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous group of tumors characterized by aggressive behavior, high risk of distant recurrence, and poor survival. Chemotherapy is still the main therapeutic approach for this subgroup of patients, therefore, progress in the treatment of TNBC remains an important challenge. Data derived from molecular technologies have identified TNBCs with different gene expression and mutation profiles that may help developing targeted therapies. So far, however, only a few of these have shown to improve the prognosis and outcomes of TNBC patients. Robust predictive biomarkers to accelerate clinical progress are needed. Herein, we review prognostic and predictive biomarkers in TNBC, discuss the current evidence supporting their use, and look at the future of this research field.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1/2CSCCTCsHRRPDL1PI3KCAPTENTILsTNBC

Identifiers

PMID32605126
PMCPMC7369987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.