Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32605077›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Brain-Computer Interface-Based Humanoid Control: A Review.

Vinay Chamola, Ankur Vineet, Anand Nayyar, Eklas Hossain

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mechanisms of brain self-regulation: psychological factors, mechanistic models and neural substrates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Engineering signalling pathways in mammalian cells.Nature biomedical engineering · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Identifying Thematics in a Brain-Computer Interface Research.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Locked-in syndrome revisited.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2023
    Review
  12. [Research advances in non-invasive brain-computer interface control strategies].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  13. Sonomyography shows feasibility as a tool to quantify joint movement at the muscle level.IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings] · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Vinay ChamolaDepartment of Electrical and Electronics, Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani 333031, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6730-3060
Ankur VineetDepartment of Electrical and Electronics, Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani 333031, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7180-8574
Anand NayyarGraduate School, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam.
Eklas HossainDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Renewable energy, Oregon Institute of Technology, Klamath Falls, OR 97601, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2332-8095
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani · INDuy Tan University · VNOregon Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) acts as a communication mechanism using brain signals to control external devices. The generation of such signals is sometimes independent of the nervous system, such as in Passive BCI. This is majorly beneficial for those who have severe motor disabilities. Traditional BCI systems have been dependent only on brain signals recorded using Electroencephalography (EEG) and have used a rule-based translation algorithm to generate control commands. However, the recent use of multi-sensor data fusion and machine learning-based translation algorithms has improved the accuracy of such systems. This paper discusses various BCI applications such as tele-presence, grasping of objects, navigation, etc. that use multi-sensor fusion and machine learning to control a humanoid robot to perform a desired task. The paper also includes a review of the methods and system design used in the discussed applications.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesMachine LearningAlgorithmsBrainElectroencephalographyHumansRoboticsbiological feedbackbrain-computer interface (BCI)data fusionelectroencephalography (EEG)nao humanoidP300

Identifiers

PMID32605077
PMCPMC7374399
OpenAlexW3037047196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.