Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32605048›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Long-Term Evaluation and Calibration of Low-Cost Particulate Matter (PM) Sensor.

Hoochang Lee, Jiseock Kang, Sungjung Kim, Yunseok Im, Seungsung Yoo, Dongjun Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluating the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Monitors in Dallas, Texas.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hoochang LeeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Jiseock KangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Sungjung KimDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Yunseok ImAir Quality Analysis and Control Center, Seoul Metropolitan Research Institute of Public Health and Environment, 30, Janggunmaeul 3-gil, Gwacheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Seungsung YooAir Quality Analysis and Control Center, Seoul Metropolitan Research Institute of Public Health and Environment, 30, Janggunmaeul 3-gil, Gwacheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Dongjun LeeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea.

Funding

City of Seoul through Seoul Urban Data Science Laboratory 0660-20170004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-cost light scattering particulate matter (PM) sensors have been widely researched and deployed in order to overcome the limitations of low spatio-temporal resolution of government-operated beta attenuation monitor (BAM). However, the accuracy of low-cost sensors has been questioned, thus impeding their wide adoption in practice. To evaluate the accuracy of low-cost PM sensors in the field, a multi-sensor platform has been developed and co-located with BAM in Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Korea from 15 January 2019 to 4 September 2019. In this paper, a sample variation of low-cost sensors has been analyzed while using three commercial low-cost PM sensors. Influences on PM sensor by environmental conditions, such as humidity, temperature, and ambient light, have also been described. Based on this information, we developed a novel combined calibration algorithm, which selectively applies multiple calibration models and statistically reduces residuals, while using a prebuilt parameter lookup table where each cell records statistical parameters of each calibration model at current input parameters. As our proposed framework significantly improves the accuracy of the low-cost PM sensors (e.g., RMSE: 23.94 → 4.70 μ g/m 3 ) and increases the correlation (e.g., R 2 : 0.41 → 0.89), this calibration model can be transferred to all sensor nodes through the sensor network.

Indexed as

calibrationlow-cost sensormultilayer perceptron (MLP)multivariate linear regression (MLR)particulate matter (PM)segmented model and residual treatment (SMART) calibration

Identifiers

PMID32605048
PMCPMC7374294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.