Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32605033›Full record

ArticleToxins2020

Reducing Ochratoxin A Content in Grape Pomace by Different Methods.

Jianmei Yu, Ivy N Smith, Nona Mikiashvili

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jianmei YuDepartment of Family and Consumer Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
Ivy N SmithDepartment of Family and Consumer Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
Nona MikiashviliDepartment of Family and Consumer Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University · US

Funding

USDA-NIFA 2013-38821-21147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grape pomace (GP) is the residue of grapes after wine making and is a valuable source of dietary polyphenol and fiber for health promotion. However, studies found the presence of ochratoxin A (OTA) in GP at very high concentrations, which raises a safety issue in the value-added utilization of GP. This study evaluated the effects of thermal pressure, baking, acid and enzymatic treatments on OTA content in GP. Thermal pressure treatment was conducted with wet GP at 121 °C for 10-30 min in an autoclave; acid treatments were conducted with hydrochloric acid, acetic acid, citric acid, and lactic acid, respectively, at 50 °C for 24 h. Baking was conducted using a cookie model. For enzymatic treatment, purified OTA solution was treated with carboxypeptidase A, alcalase, flavourzyme, pepsin, and lipase, respectively, and the effective enzymes were selected to treat GP. Results show that autoclaving for 10-30 min reduced 19-80% of OTA, varying with treatment time and GP variety. The effectiveness of acid treatment was similar to that of autoclaving and varied with acid type and GP variety. Baking increased the detectable OTA. Among all tested enzymes, carboxypeptidase A was the most effective in reducing OTA, followed by lipase and flavourzyme, but their effects were significantly lower in GP samples.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyCarboxypeptidases AEndopeptidasesEnzymesFood HandlingFruitFungiHot TemperatureHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationInactivation, MetabolicIndustrial WasteLipaseOchratoxinsPressureVitisCarboxypeptidases AEndopeptidasesEnzymesflavourzymeIndustrial WasteLipaseochratoxin AOchratoxinsacid treatmentenzymatic treatmentochratoxin AOTA reductionthermal pressure treatment

Identifiers

PMID32605033
PMCPMC7404766
OpenAlexW3038558460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.