Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32604894›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2020

Antibacterial Activity of Four Plant Extracts Extracted from Traditional Chinese Medicinal Plants against

R L McMurray, M E E Ball, M M Tunney, N Corcionivoschi, C Situ

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current Insights into Antibiotic Resistance in UropathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Component characterization ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ginsenoside Ro improves Salmonella Typhimurium-induced colitis through inhibition of the virulence factors SopB and SopE2 via the RAC1/CDC42/ARP2/3 pathway.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R L McMurrayQueen's University Belfast, School of Biological Sciences, Belfast BT9 5DL, Northern Ireland, UK.
M E E BallAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland, UK.
M M TunneyQueen's University Belfast, School of Pharmacy Belfast BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK.
N CorcionivoschiAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Veterinary Sciences Division, Belfast BT4 3SD, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3011-3108
C SituQueen's University Belfast, Institute for Global Food Security, Belfast BT9 5DL, Northern Ireland, UK.

Funding

Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs, UK Government DAERA PhD Studentship, DAERA have confirmed that they do not wish to have a grant number attached.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The worldwide ethnobotanical use of four investigated plants indicates antibacterial properties. The aim of this study was to screen and determine significant antibacterial activity of four plant extracts in vitro and in a poultry digest model. Using broth microdilution, the concentrations at which four plant extracts inhibited

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceantimicrobial susceptibilitybroilerbroth microdilutionchickendigestin vitro modelpathogensplant extractstime–kill assay

Identifiers

PMID32604894
PMCPMC7355567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.