ArticleInsects2020
Evaluation of Five Medicinal Plant Extracts on
Article in Insects, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Field evaluation of entomopathogenic fungi and Usher plant Calotropis procera extract for controlling aphids and whiteflies on pepper.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effect of botanical powders and the assassin bug,Open research Africa · 2024Article
- Mediterranean Plants as Potential Source of Biopesticides: An Overview of Current Research and Future Trends.Metabolites · 2023Review
- The Toxicity ofToxins · 2022Article
- Comparative conventional preventive strategies for insect pest of okra.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2022Article
- Contribution of insect gut microbiota and their associated enzymes in insect physiology and biodegradation of pesticides.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Insecticidal Activities AgainstInsects · 2021Article
- Article
- Phytochemical Screening and Bioactivity ofInsects · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Botanical insecticides that degrade rapidly are safer than persistent synthetic chemical insecticides, less harmful to the environment, decrease production costs and are not likely to cause insecticide resistance among pests. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of five different botanical extracts on the bean aphid,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.