ArticleBiomolecules2020
Concise Polygenic Models for Cancer-Specific Identification of Drug-Sensitive Tumors from Their Multi-Omics Profiles.
Article in Biomolecules, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and anti-cancer drugs' response.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- Predicting atezolizumab response in metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients using machine learning on integrated tumour gene expression and clinical data.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- UMAP-based clustering split for rigorous evaluation of AI models for virtual screening on cancer cell lines.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Large-Scale Machine Learning Analysis Reveals DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Response Signatures for Gemcitabine-Treated Pancreatic Cancer.Health data science · 2024Article
- Graph neural networks are promising for phenotypic virtual screening on cancer cell lines.Biology methods & protocols · 2024Article
- Deep learning facilitates multi-data type analysis and predictive biomarker discovery in cancer precision medicine.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- A Boolean-based machine learning framework identifies predictive biomarkers of HSP90-targeted therapy response in prostate cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
- NeRD: a multichannel neural network to predict cellular response of drugs by integrating multidimensional data.BMC medicine · 2022Article
- Tissue-specific identification of multi-omics features for pan-cancer drug response prediction.iScience · 2022Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning Models to Predict the Resistance of Breast Cancer Patients to Doxorubicin from Their microRNA Profiles.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Predicting Cancer Drug Response In Vivo by Learning an Optimal Feature Selection of Tumour Molecular Profiles.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Oncology: Towards the Establishment of Precision Medicine.Cancers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In silico models to predict which tumors will respond to a given drug are necessary for Precision Oncology. However, predictive models are only available for a handful of cases (each case being a given drug acting on tumors of a specific cancer type). A way to generate predictive models for the remaining cases is with suitable machine learning algorithms that are yet to be applied to existing in vitro pharmacogenomics datasets. Here, we apply XGBoost integrated with a stringent feature selection approach, which is an algorithm that is advantageous for these high-dimensional problems. Thus, we identified and validated 118 predictive models for 62 drugs across five cancer types by exploiting four molecular profiles (sequence mutations, copy-number alterations, gene expression, and DNA methylation). Predictive models were found in each cancer type and with every molecular profile. On average, no omics profile or cancer type obtained models with higher predictive accuracy than the rest. However, within a given cancer type, some molecular profiles were overrepresented among predictive models. For instance, CNA profiles were predictive in breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) cell lines, but not in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines where gene expression (GEX) and DNA methylation profiles were the most predictive. Lastly, we identified the best XGBoost model per cancer type and analyzed their selected features. For each model, some of the genes in the selected list had already been found to be individually linked to the response to that drug, providing additional evidence of the usefulness of these models and the merits of the feature selection scheme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.