Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32604674›Full record

ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2020

Rules Based Data Quality Assessment on Claims Database.

Mary A Gadde, Zhan Wang, Meredith Zozus, John B Talburt, Melody L Greer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Derivation and validation of an algorithm for maternal-child linkage in electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary A GaddeUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Littlerock, Arkansas, USA.
Zhan WangUniversity of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Meredith ZozusUniversity of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
John B TalburtUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Littlerock, Arkansas, USA.
Melody L GreerUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Littlerock, Arkansas, USA.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

Expanding Translational Research in ArkansasUL1TR003107 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI JAMES, LAURA P · 2019 to 2023
$21.6M
J. NRSA TrainingTL1TR003109 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI SEXTON, KEVIN WAYNE · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR003109NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data quality problems in coded clinical and administrative data have persisted ever since diagnoses and procedures were first coded and used for healthcare billing. These data are used in clinical decision-making introducing a route for iatrogenesis. As we share data on regional Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) and include them in electronic health records the potential for harm may be increased. To study this problem we applied rules-based data quality checks that have been previously tested on Electronic Health Records (EHR) data on a limited set of aggregated claims data. Medicaid claims data was used exclusively. CMS has clear guidelines for claims submitted for Medicaid patients and penalties are incurred for erroneous claims, which should ensure a high quality data source, however reports of low and varying sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of coded diagnoses are common. To identify data quality defects in claims data in a state All Payer Claims Dataset (APCD) we applied and evaluated a recently developed rules-based data quality assessment and monitoring system for Electronic Health Record (EHR) data to test effectiveness in claims data. These rules, that are feasible for "All Payer Claims data" and Medicaid data are identified, applied and the Data Quality issue results are produced.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyElectronic Health RecordsDatabases, FactualHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMedicaidUnited StatesData qualityHealthcare Rules

Identifiers

PMID32604674
PMCPMC7899162
OpenAlexW3039431593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.