ArticleInternational journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology2020
Cost benefit of coblation versus electrocautery adenotonsillectomy for pediatric patients.
Article in International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- A retrospective observational cohort study evaluating the postoperative outcomes of intracapsular coblation tonsillectomy in children.Scientific reports · 2022Review
- Article
- Comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the therapeutic effects of coblation tonsillectomy versus electrocautery tonsillectomy.Gland surgery · 2022Article
- Considerations in Surgical Management of Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Tonsillectomy and Beyond.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Evaluating a Modified Coblation Technique in Adenoidectomy: A Single-Blind Randomized Study.OTO openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCoblation and electrocautery are two common techniques used for adenotonsillectomy (T&A). Numerous studies have assessed surgical outcomes of coblation versus electrocautery and overall, postoperative complications are similar with the exception of a decrease in patient reported postoperative pain for coblation. Instrumentation required for coblation is significantly more expensive than that required for electrocautery. With minimal outcome differences, justification for the additional instrumentation costs is difficult. We performed this study to assess if there is a difference between operative & postoperative costs of electrocautery and coblation.
methods300 patient medical records were reviewed from 2015 to 2017 with equal numbers of electrocautery and coblation surgeries. Outcome measures included finance information, duration and cost of OR and Phase I and Phase II post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), in-hospital pharmacy costs, and postoperative complications. Logistic regression was used for analysis.
resultsThe median patient age for each surgical technique was 6 years old. Electrocautery resulted in more time in the OR compared to coblation, (OR:1.11,95%CI:1.07-1.15, p < .001), with greater associated costs, p < .001. Electrocautery patients were under anesthesia longer and had a longer surgical duration, p < .001. These same patients had longer duration in Phase II PACU, p = .028, and were given pain medications an increased number of times, p < .001. Total costs including operative expense, physician charges, OR and anesthesia times, pharmacy, and instrument were significantly higher for electrocautery patients, p = .003. There were no differences in ED visits, post-tonsillectomy bleed, or additional surgery between techniques, p > .05.
conclusionT&A electrocautery technique was found to have increased overall indirect costs. Costs of instrumentation in addition to increased operative time, use of analgesics and post-operative care contribute to costs associated with electrocautery and coblation should be used when assessing surgical costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.