Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32604000›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2020

T cell analysis in vaccination.

Mark M Davis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Biotechnologia · 2023
    Article
  5. CD8Science immunology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mark M DavisHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States; Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States; Immunology Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: mmdavis@stanford.edu.

Funding

Using a tonsil organoid system to probe conditions for the induction of protective antibody and T cell responses to influenza.U19AI057229 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Morris Davis · 2003 to 2026
$88.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS U19 AI057229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major problem in the analysis of vaccine candidates is the lack of any agreed upon surrogates of efficacy, which means that for diseases that depend on a strong T cell response (HIV, TB especially) the only option is to perform an efficacy trial, involving thousands of subjects, enormous costs, and years before the results are known [1]. We also know that T cell responses are an important part of most pathogen responses, and so identifying key T cell response metrics in early vaccine trials would be generally useful. Given our ignorance of what the most important variables are, what would we like to measure and how can this be accomplished, especially given the explosion of new technologies that are available? What follows is a consideration of what should be measured, with the caveat that some of these will be more important than others.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansT-LymphocytesVaccination

Identifiers

PMID32604000
PMCPMC7872128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.