Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32603814›Full record

SynthesisAdvanced drug delivery reviews2020

Cancer therapy with iron oxide nanoparticles: Agents of thermal and immune therapies.

Frederik Soetaert, Preethi Korangath, David Serantes, Steven Fiering, Robert Ivkov

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 383 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Golden era of radiosensitizers.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Verification and validation in canine cadaver of an MPI-integrable RF head coil for magnetic particle hyperthermia.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Spatiotemporal cancer controlNanomedicine (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Advances in the application of molecular docking in nanomedicine.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Magnetic Hydrogels as a Treatment for Oncological Pathologies.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. The Dual Role ofBiology · 2025
    Review

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Frederik SoetaertDepartment of Electrical Energy, Metals, Mechanical Constructions and Systems, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Preethi KorangathDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
David SerantesDepartment of Applied Physics and Instituto de Investigacións Tecnolóxicas, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15782, Spain.
Steven FieringGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
Robert IvkovDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore 21218, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore 21218, USA. Electronic address: rivkov1@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USDartmouth College · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

Translational Application of Magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy with Adjuvant Therapies for GlioblastomaR01CA247290 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HADJIPANAYIS, CONSTANTINOS GEORGE, IVKOV, ROBERT · 2020 to 2024
$3.5M
Enhancing Liver Cancer Treatment With Image-Guided Magnetic HyperthermiaR01CA194574 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IVKOV, ROBERT · 2015 to 2019
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194574NCI NIH HHS R01 CA247290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant research and preclinical investment in cancer nanomedicine has produced several products, which have improved cancer care. Nevertheless, there exists a perception that cancer nanomedicine 'has not lived up to its promise' because the number of approved products and their clinical performance are modest. Many of these analyses do not consider the long clinical history and many clinical products developed from iron oxide nanoparticles. Iron oxide nanoparticles have enjoyed clinical use for about nine decades demonstrating safety, and considerable clinical utility and versatility. FDA-approved applications of iron oxide nanoparticles include cancer diagnosis, cancer hyperthermia therapy, and iron deficiency anemia. For cancer nanomedicine, this wealth of clinical experience is invaluable to provide key lessons and highlight pitfalls in the pursuit of nanotechnology-based cancer therapeutics. We review the clinical experience with systemic liposomal drug delivery and parenteral therapy of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) with iron oxide nanoparticles. We note that the clinical success of injectable iron exploits the inherent interaction between nanoparticles and the (innate) immune system, which designers of liposomal drug delivery seek to avoid. Magnetic fluid hyperthermia, a cancer therapy that harnesses magnetic hysteresis heating is approved for treating humans only with iron oxide nanoparticles. Despite its successful demonstration to enhance overall survival in clinical trials, this nanotechnology-based thermal medicine struggles to establish a clinical presence. We review the physical and biological attributes of this approach, and suggest reasons for barriers to its acceptance. Finally, despite the extensive clinical experience with iron oxide nanoparticles new and exciting research points to surprising immune-modulating potential. Recent data demonstrate the interactions between immune cells and iron oxide nanoparticles can induce anti-tumor immune responses. These present new and exciting opportunities to explore additional applications with this venerable technology. Clinical applications of iron oxide nanoparticles present poignant case studies of the opportunities, complexities, and challenges in cancer nanomedicine. They also illustrate the need for revised paradigms and multidisciplinary approaches to develop and translate nanomedicines into clinical cancer care.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsHumansHyperthermia, InducedImmune SystemImmunotherapyMagnetic Iron Oxide NanoparticlesNeoplasmsCancerImmune therapyIron deficiency anemiaIron oxide nanoparticlesMagnetic nanoparticle hyperthermiaNanomedicine

Identifiers

PMID32603814
PMCPMC7736167
OpenAlexW3037095003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.