Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32603690›Full record

ReviewMolecular metabolism2020

Regulation of inflammation in diabetes: From genetics to epigenomics evidence.

Marc Diedisheim, Elena Carcarino, Claire Vandiedonck, Ronan Roussel, Jean-François Gautier, Nicolas Venteclef

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Insulin Resistance and Inflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marc DiedisheimCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Université de Paris, IMMEDIAB Laboratory, F-75006, Paris, France.
Elena CarcarinoCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Université de Paris, IMMEDIAB Laboratory, F-75006, Paris, France.
Claire VandiedonckCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Université de Paris, IMMEDIAB Laboratory, F-75006, Paris, France.
Ronan RousselCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Université de Paris, IMMEDIAB Laboratory, F-75006, Paris, France; Bichat-Claude Bernard, Hospital, AP-HP, Diabetology Department, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Jean-François GautierCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Université de Paris, IMMEDIAB Laboratory, F-75006, Paris, France; Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Diabetology Department, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Nicolas VenteclefCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Université de Paris, IMMEDIAB Laboratory, F-75006, Paris, France. Electronic address: nicolas.venteclef@inserm.fr.
Inserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes is one of the greatest public health challenges worldwide, and we still lack complementary approaches to significantly enhance the efficacy of preventive and therapeutic approaches. Genetic and environmental factors are the culprits involved in diabetes risk. Evidence from the last decade has highlighted that deregulation in the immune and inflammatory responses increase susceptibility to type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Spatiotemporal patterns of gene expression involved in immune cell polarisation depend on genomic enhancer elements in response to inflammatory and metabolic cues. Several studies have reported that most regulatory genetic variants are located in the non-protein coding regions of the genome and particularly in enhancer regions. The progress of high-throughput technologies has permitted the characterisation of enhancer chromatin properties. These advances support the concept that genetic alteration of enhancers may influence the immune and inflammatory responses in relation to diabetes. SCOPE OF REVIEW: Results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) combined with functional and integrative analyses have elucidated the impacts of some diabetes risk-associated variants that are involved in the regulation of the immune system. Additionally, genetic variant mapping to enhancer regions may alter enhancer status, which in turn leads to aberrant expression of inflammatory genes associated with diabetes susceptibility. The focus of this review was to provide an overview of the current indications that inflammatory processes are regulated at the genetic and epigenomic levels in diabetes, along with perspectives on future research avenues that may improve understanding of the disease. MAJOR

conclusionsIn this review, we provide genetic evidence in support of a deregulated immune response as a risk factor in diabetes. We also argue about the importance of enhancer regions in the regulation of immune cell polarisation and how the recent advances using genome-wide methods for enhancer identification have enabled the determination of the impact of enhancer genetic variation on diabetes onset and phenotype. This could eventually lead to better management plans and improved treatment responses in human diabetes.

Indexed as

ChromatinDiabetes MellitusEnhancer Elements, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsGene ExpressionGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsGenotypeHumansInflammationPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideChromatinDiabetesEnhancerEpigeneticsGeneticsInflammation

Identifiers

PMID32603690
PMCPMC7394913
OpenAlexW3038022560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.