ReviewBiology letters2020
Disparities in the analysis of morphological disparity.
Review in Biology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary decoupling between cranial shape and size underlies divergent evolutionary pathways in Cretaceous apex and meso-predator theropods.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Mapping life's disparity and evolutionary constraints in a geometric complexity space.Science advances · 2026Article
- Morphological innovation and lineage-specific history drive disparification in the aggregated pollen of mimosoid plants.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Morphological disparity across the K-Pg boundary in mollusk shells: A theoretical morphology approach.PloS one · 2026Article
- Early sarcopterygian morphological disparity through the Devonian-Carboniferous crisis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Body mass evolution as a driver of morphological and ecological diversity in terrestrial mammals.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Morphological constraints in hymenopteran forewings limit flight efficiency optimization.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Building and Visualising Ordinations of Shape Data in R WithEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Macroevolutionary trends in Ceratosauria body size: insights of phylogenetic comparative methods.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Semicircular canals shed light on bottleneck events in the evolution of the Neanderthal clade.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Quantifying the configurational complexity of biological systems in multivariate 'complexity space'.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Article
- Distinct causes underlie double-peaked trilobite morphological disparity in cephalic shape.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Functional and Character Disparity Are Decoupled in Turtle Mandibles.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- A macroevolutionary analysis of European Late Upper Palaeolithic stone tool shape using a Bayesian phylodynamic framework.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Widespread convergence towards functional optimization in the lower jaws of crocodile-line archosaurs.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Male and female contributions to diversity among birdwing butterfly images.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Heterogeneous selectivity and morphological evolution of marine clades during the Permian-Triassic mass extinction.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Article
- The influence of the land-to-sea macroevolutionary transition on vertebral column disparification in Pinnipedia.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Angiosperm flowers reached their highest morphological diversity early in their evolutionary history.The New phytologist · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analyses of morphological disparity have been used to characterize and investigate the evolution of variation in the anatomy, function and ecology of organisms since the 1980s. While a diversity of methods have been employed, it is unclear whether they provide equivalent insights. Here, we review the most commonly used approaches for characterizing and analysing morphological disparity, all of which have associated limitations that, if ignored, can lead to misinterpretation. We propose best practice guidelines for disparity analyses, while noting that there can be no 'one-size-fits-all' approach. The available tools should always be used in the context of a specific biological question that will determine data and method selection at every stage of the analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.