ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2020
Contributions of Auditory and Somatosensory Feedback to Vocal Motor Control.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of the TruBlue Light Laser for Laryngeal Somatosensory and Perturbation Testing.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Active inference and speech motor control.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Oscillatory brain indexes of auditory-induced predictions about contingences during vocalizations.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Comparison of Voice Stimulability Testing in Telehealth and In-Person Formats.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025Article
- Patient Motivation for Voice Therapy Increases After Stimulability Testing: Validation of a Voice Therapy Motivation and Voice Perception Inventory.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024Article
- Deep Learning for Neuromuscular Control of Vocal Source for Voice Production.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Do Not Cut Off Your Tail: A Mega-Analysis of Responses to Auditory Perturbation Experiments.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- DIVA Meets EEG: Model Validation Using Formant-Shift Reflex.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Auditory and Somatosensory Development for Speech in Later Childhood.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of laryngeal and articulatory speech motor control.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Assessing Ecologically Valid Methods of Auditory Feedback Measurement in Individuals With Typical Speech.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Quantitatively characterizing reflexive responses to pitch perturbations.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Brain adaptation following various unilateral vocal fold paralysis treatments: A magnetic resonance imaging based longitudinal case series.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
- Adaptation to pitch-altered feedback is independent of one's own voice pitch sensitivity.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The Experiences of Transgender and Gender Diverse Individuals after Intonation Training for a More Feminine-Sounding Voice: A Qualitative Study.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To better define the contributions of somatosensory and auditory feedback in vocal motor control, a laryngeal perturbation experiment was conducted with and without masking of auditory feedback. Method Eighteen native speakers of English produced a sustained vowel while their larynx was physically and externally displaced on a subset of trials. For the condition with auditory masking, speech-shaped noise was played via earphones at 90 dB SPL. Responses to the laryngeal perturbation were compared to responses by the same participants to an auditory perturbation experiment that involved a 100-cent downward shift in fundamental frequency (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.