Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32603621›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2020

Individual Differences in Mothers' Spontaneous Infant-Directed Speech Predict Language Attainment in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Laura Dilley, Matthew Lehet, Elizabeth A Wieland, Meisam K Arjmandi, Maria Kondaurova, Yuanyuan Wang, Jessa Reed, Mario Svirsky, Derek Houston, Tonya Bergeson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fathers' unmodulated prosody in child-directed speech.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laura DilleyDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Matthew LehetDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Elizabeth A WielandDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Meisam K ArjmandiDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Maria KondaurovaDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, KY.
Yuanyuan WangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Jessa ReedDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Mario SvirskyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York University, New York City.
Derek HoustonDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Tonya BergesonDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Butler University, Indianapolis.

Funding

Infant-Directed Speech and Language Development in Infants with Hearing LossR01DC008581 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DILLEY, LAURA C, HOUSTON, DEREK M · 2007 to 2019
$5.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Differences across language environments of prelingually deaf children who receive cochlear implants (CIs) may affect language acquisition; yet, whether mothers show individual differences in how they modify infant-directed (ID) compared with adult-directed (AD) speech has seldom been studied. This study assessed individual differences in how mothers realized speech modifications in ID register and whether these predicted differences in language outcomes for children with CIs. Method Participants were 36 dyads of mothers and their children aged 0;8-2;5 (years;months) at the time of CI implantation. Mothers' spontaneous speech was recorded in a lab setting in ID or AD conditions before ~15 months postimplantation. Mothers' speech samples were characterized for acoustic-phonetic and lexical properties established as canonical indices of ID speech to typically hearing infants, such as vowel space area differences, fundamental frequency variability, and speech rate. Children with CIs completed longitudinal administrations of one or more standardized language assessment instruments at variable intervals from 6 months to 9.5 years postimplantation. Standardized scores on assessments administered longitudinally were used to calculate linear regressions, which gave rise to predicted language scores for children at 2 years postimplantation and language growth over 2-year intervals. Results Mothers showed individual differences in how they modified speech in ID versus AD registers. Crucially, these individual differences significantly predicted differences in estimated language outcomes at 2 years postimplantation in children with CIs. Maternal speech variation in lexical quantity and vowel space area differences across ID and AD registers most frequently predicted estimates of language attainment in children with CIs, whereas prosodic differences played a minor role. Conclusion Results support that caregiver language behaviors play a substantial role in explaining variability in language attainment in children receiving CIs. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12560147.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsDeafnessSpeech PerceptionAdultChildFemaleHumansIndividualityInfantLanguageLanguage DevelopmentMothersSpeech

Identifiers

PMID32603621
PMCPMC7838839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.