ArticleThoracic cancer2020
Clinical effect of bronchial arterial infusion chemotherapy and CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads in patients with stage II-IV lung cancer: A prospective cohort study.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07738367 (A Single-Arm Phase II Study of Bronchial Artery Chemoembolization), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Single-Arm Phase II Study of Bronchial Artery Chemoembolization (BACE) Combination Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without Standard Treatment Options
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting beads versus conventional bronchial arterial chemoembolization for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Analysis on the Efficacy of Bronchial Artery Chemoembolization Combined with 125I Seed Implantation in the Therapy of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Based on the Medical Database.BioMed research international · 2022Trial
- Bronchial artery infusion of PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy improves progression-free survival in advanced NSCLC: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial infusion chemoembolization vs. bland embolization in advanced lung cancer with hemoptysis: A multicenter retrospective study.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
- Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization With Drug-eluting Beads Versus With Gelfoam Particles for Advanced Nonsmall-cell Lung Cancer.Journal of thoracic imaging · 2025Article
- Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for lung malignant tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Clinical study on bronchial artery chemoembolization for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical evaluation of oxaliplatin-loaded drug-eluting callispheres beads transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Clinical research progress of callisperesDiscover oncology · 2024Review
- Maintenance treatment of immunotherapy after microwave ablation plus drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective single-center cohort study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Bronchial artery chemoembolization in the treatment of refractory central lung cancer with atelectasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Analysis of prognostic factors in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer complicated by hemorrhage treated by drug-eluting bead embolization.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
- Article
- Standard treatment-refractory/ineligible small cell lung cancer treated with drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization: a retrospective cohort study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Advancements in Interventional Oncology of the Chest: Transarterial Chemoembolization and Related Therapies.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2022Review
- Efficacy Analysis of DSA-Guided Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization Interventional Therapy in Patients with Middle-Advanced Primary Bronchial Lung Cancer.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical outcomes of vinorelbine loading CalliSpheres beads in the treatment of previously treated advanced lung cancer with progressive refractory obstructive atelectasis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- The safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin-loaded drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable or advanced lung cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Clinical outcomes of gemcitabine-loaded callispheres drug-eluting beads for patients with advanced and inoperable lung cancer: A case series study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCalliSpheres are drug-eluting beads used for tumor artery embolization, with clinical benefits in a number of cancer types. The aim of the study was to examine the clinical benefits and complications of patients with stage II-IV lung cancer treated with CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads for embolization versus conventional vascular interventional treatment.
methodsThis was a prospective cohort study conducted from August 2018 to May 2019. The patients were grouped according to traditional bronchial arterial infusion chemotherapy (infusion group) or bronchial arterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads loaded with adriamycin (CallisSphere group). Short-term effects, serum tumor markers, and adverse reactions during follow-up were compared between the two groups.
resultsThere were 60 participants enrolled into the study with 30 in each group including 54 men and six women, 42-78 years of age. In the CalliSphere group, compared with the infusion group, the disease control rate was 93.3% versus 73.3% (P = 0.080) and the objective remission rate (ORR) was 86.7% versus 60.0% (P = 0.039); the three- and six-month progression-free survival (PFS) and six-month overall survival (OS) were better in the CalliSphere group (three-month PFS: 96.7% vs. 73.3%, P = 0.026; six-month PFS: 87.5% vs. 57.1%, P = 0.045; six-month OS: 87.5% vs. 52.7%, P = 0.024); after treatment, the tumor markers in the CalliSphere group were lower (CEA: P < 0.001; CYFRA21-1: P = 0.014). There were no differences in adverse reactions between the two groups.
conclusionsThe clinical effect of bronchial arterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads on lung cancer is probably significant and could improve the short-term response, PFS, and OS in patients with stage IIIV lung cancer, without increasing severe adverse reactions. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: The clinical effect of bronchial arterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads on lung cancer is probably significant and could improve the short-term response, PFS, and OS in patients with stage II-IV lung cancer, without increasing severe adverse reactions. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: The ORR, PFS, OS was better in the CalliSphere group than that of infusion group; CEA and CYFRA21-1 were significant lower in CalliSphere group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.