ArticlePloS one2020
Utility of digitising point of care HIV test results to accurately measure, and improve performance towards, the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the validity of routine individuated service data for antenatal HIV surveillance in the Western Cape.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- The impact of evolving maternal antiretroviral therapy guidelines on vertical transmission of HIV in the Western Cape, South Africa.PloS one · 2025Article
- HIV retesting prevalence among clients accessing anti-retroviral therapy and HIV testing services in Ghana.PloS one · 2025Article
- Recent infection testing to inform HIV prevention responses and surveillance in a programme context: lessons from implementation within a nationally scaled female sex worker programme in Zimbabwe.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024Article
- Exploring the validity of routine individuated service data for antenatal HIV surveillance in the Western Cape.Research square · 2024Article
- Migrant men and HIV care engagement in Johannesburg, South Africa.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Moving towards a person-centred HIV care cascade: An exploration of potential biases and errors in routine data in South Africa.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Maintaining HIV testing and treatment services in Zambia during COVID-19: a story of success and resilience.Global health action · 2023Article
- Validity of Self-Report for Ascertaining HIV Status Among Circular Migrants and Permanent Residents in South Africa: A Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Analysis.AIDS and behavior · 2023Article
- The future of HIV testing in eastern and southern Africa: Broader scope, targeted services.PLoS medicine · 2023Article
- Trajectories of re-engagement: factors and mechanisms enabling patient return to HIV care in Zambia.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2023Article
- Interpreting declines in HIV test positivity: an analysis of routine data from Zimbabwe's national sex work programme, 2009-2019.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2022Article
- Understanding Repeat Positive HIV Testing in South Africa Under Changing Treatment Guidelines.AIDS and behavior · 2022Article
- Article
- Treatment-adjusted prevalence to assess HIV testing programmes.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021Article
- Trends in knowledge of HIV status and efficiency of HIV testing services in sub-Saharan Africa, 2000-20: a modelling study using survey and HIV testing programme data.The lancet. HIV · 2021Article
- The revolving door of HIV care: Revising the service delivery cascade to achieve the UNAIDS 95-95-95 goals.PLoS medicine · 2021Article
- Consolidating strategic information to monitor progress against the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets: evaluating the operational feasibility of an electronic HIV testing register in Cape Town, South Africa.BMC health services research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHigh rates of pre-treatment loss to care among persons diagnosed with HIV persist. Linkage to care can be improved through active digitally-based surveillance. Currently, record-keeping for HIV diagnoses in South Africa is paper-based. Aggregated testing data are reported routinely, and only discordant findings result in a specimen being tested at a laboratory and digitised. The Western Cape Province in South Africa has a Provincial Health Data Centre (PHDC) where person-level routine electronic data are consolidated in a single database, leveraging the existence of a unique patient identifier. To facilitate improved HIV surveillance, a pre-carbonated point-of-care test (PoCT) form was piloted, where one copy was routed to a central point and digitised for PHDC inclusion.
methodsWe evaluated the utility of the intervention using cross-sectional and retrospective cohort analyses, as well as comparisons with aggregate data. Data were linked to the Patient Master Index of the PHDC using unique identifiers. Prior evidences of HIV within the PHDC were used to differentiate newly diagnosed patients and those retesting, as well as linkage to care and treatment.
resultsFrom May 2017 to June 2018, 11337 digitised point-of-care HIV testing records were linked to the PHDC. Overall, 96% of records in the aggregate dataset were digitised, with 97% linked to the PHDC. Of those tested, 79% were female (median age 27 years). Linkage demonstrated that 51.3% (95% CI 48.4-54.1%) of patients testing HIV-positive were retesting. Of those newly diagnosed, 81% (95% CI 77.9-84.3%) were linked to HIV care and 25% (95% CI 21.6-28.7%) were initiated on antiretroviral therapy immediately.
conclusionDigitisation of PoCT results provides individuated HIV testing data to assist in linkage to care and in differentiating newly diagnosed patients from positive patients retesting. Actionable and accurate data can improve the measurement of performance towards the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.