Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32603374›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Utility of digitising point of care HIV test results to accurately measure, and improve performance towards, the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets.

Nisha Jacob, Brian Rice, Emma Kalk, Alexa Heekes, Jennie Morgan, James Hargreaves, Andrew Boulle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Treatment-adjusted prevalence to assess HIV testing programmes.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nisha JacobSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7028-5772
Brian RiceLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Emma KalkSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7706-6866
Alexa HeekesSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jennie MorganSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
James HargreavesLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew BoulleSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Western Cape Department of Health · ZALondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

Observational Antiretroviral Studies In Southern Africa (OASIS) CollaborationU01AI069924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITAT BERN · PI Cleophas Chimbetete, Mary-Ann Davies · 2006 to 2026
$55.9M
B positive_A population based evaluation of expanded ART access in pregnancyR01HD080465 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI KALK, EMMA KATE · 2014 to 2019
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069924NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD080465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHigh rates of pre-treatment loss to care among persons diagnosed with HIV persist. Linkage to care can be improved through active digitally-based surveillance. Currently, record-keeping for HIV diagnoses in South Africa is paper-based. Aggregated testing data are reported routinely, and only discordant findings result in a specimen being tested at a laboratory and digitised. The Western Cape Province in South Africa has a Provincial Health Data Centre (PHDC) where person-level routine electronic data are consolidated in a single database, leveraging the existence of a unique patient identifier. To facilitate improved HIV surveillance, a pre-carbonated point-of-care test (PoCT) form was piloted, where one copy was routed to a central point and digitised for PHDC inclusion.

methodsWe evaluated the utility of the intervention using cross-sectional and retrospective cohort analyses, as well as comparisons with aggregate data. Data were linked to the Patient Master Index of the PHDC using unique identifiers. Prior evidences of HIV within the PHDC were used to differentiate newly diagnosed patients and those retesting, as well as linkage to care and treatment.

resultsFrom May 2017 to June 2018, 11337 digitised point-of-care HIV testing records were linked to the PHDC. Overall, 96% of records in the aggregate dataset were digitised, with 97% linked to the PHDC. Of those tested, 79% were female (median age 27 years). Linkage demonstrated that 51.3% (95% CI 48.4-54.1%) of patients testing HIV-positive were retesting. Of those newly diagnosed, 81% (95% CI 77.9-84.3%) were linked to HIV care and 25% (95% CI 21.6-28.7%) were initiated on antiretroviral therapy immediately.

conclusionDigitisation of PoCT results provides individuated HIV testing data to assist in linkage to care and in differentiating newly diagnosed patients from positive patients retesting. Actionable and accurate data can improve the measurement of performance towards the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesData AccuracyDatabase Management SystemsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningPoint-of-Care TestingRetrospective StudiesSouth AfricaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32603374
PMCPMC7326208
OpenAlexW3038776833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.