ArticlePloS one2020
A simple strategy to enhance the speed of protein secondary structure prediction without sacrificing accuracy.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- SARST2 high-throughput and resource-efficient protein structure alignment against massive databases.Nature communications · 2025Article
- SeqCP: A sequence-based algorithm for searching circularly permuted proteins.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Deep learning for protein secondary structure prediction: Pre and post-AlphaFold.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- CirPred, the first structure modeling and linker design system for circularly permuted proteins.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- The influence of dataset homology and a rigorous evaluation strategy on protein secondary structure prediction.PloS one · 2021Article
- A secondary structure-based position-specific scoring matrix applied to the improvement in protein secondary structure prediction.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The secondary structure prediction of proteins is a classic topic of computational structural biology with a variety of applications. During the past decade, the accuracy of prediction achieved by state-of-the-art algorithms has been >80%; meanwhile, the time cost of prediction increased rapidly because of the exponential growth of fundamental protein sequence data. Based on literature studies and preliminary observations on the relationships between the size/homology of the fundamental protein dataset and the speed/accuracy of predictions, we raised two hypotheses that might be helpful to determine the main influence factors of the efficiency of secondary structure prediction. Experimental results of size and homology reductions of the fundamental protein dataset supported those hypotheses. They revealed that shrinking the size of the dataset could substantially cut down the time cost of prediction with a slight decrease of accuracy, which could be increased on the contrary by homology reduction of the dataset. Moreover, the Shannon information entropy could be applied to explain how accuracy was influenced by the size and homology of the dataset. Based on these findings, we proposed that a proper combination of size and homology reductions of the protein dataset could speed up the secondary structure prediction while preserving the high accuracy of state-of-the-art algorithms. Testing the proposed strategy with the fundamental protein dataset of the year 2018 provided by the Universal Protein Resource, the speed of prediction was enhanced over 20 folds while all accuracy measures remained equivalently high. These findings are supposed helpful for improving the efficiency of researches and applications depending on the secondary structure prediction of proteins. To make future implementations of the proposed strategy easy, we have established a database of size and homology reduced protein datasets at http://10.life.nctu.edu.tw/UniRefNR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.