ArticlePloS one2020
User-relevant factors determining prosthesis choice in persons with major unilateral upper limb defects: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05579002 (Evaluation of the Functional Outcome of a Bionic Myoelectric Prosthesis), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Functional Outcome of a Bionic Myoelectric Prosthesis (Hero Arm) in Children With Upper Limb Agenesis After One Year of Use.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distal Femoral Dimensions in Turkish Population and Their Implications in Knee Prosthesis.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Economic evaluation of upper limb prostheses in the Netherlands including the cost-effectiveness of multi-grip versus standard myoelectric hand prostheses.Disability and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- The second clinical study investigating the surgical method for the kineticomyographic control implementation of the bionic hand.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The multi-grip and standard myoelectric hand prosthesis compared: does the multi-grip hand live up to its promise?Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Article
- Experience of adults with upper-limb difference and their views on sensory feedback for prostheses: a mixed methods study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Adolescents with congenital limb reduction deficiency: Perceptions of treatment during childhood and its meaning for their current and future situation.Child: care, health and development · 2022Article
- The heavier the arm, the higher the action: the effects of forearm-weight changes on reach-to-grasp movements.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Effect of multi-grip myoelectric prosthetic hands on daily activities, pain-related disability and prosthesis use compared with single-grip myoelectric prostheses: A single-case study.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2022Article
- Playing the piano with a robotic third thumb: assessing constraints of human augmentation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A User-Driven Approach to Prosthetic Upper Limb Development in Korea.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Need to Work Arm in Arm: Calling for Collaboration in Delivering Neuroprosthetic Limb Replacements.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveConsidering the high rejection rates of upper limb prostheses, it is important to determine which prosthesis fits best the needs of each user. The introduction of the multi-grip prostheses hands (MHP), which have functional advantages but are also more expensive, has made prosthesis selection even harder. Therefore, we aimed to identify user opinions on factors determining prosthesis choice of persons with major unilateral upper limb defects in order to facilitate a more optimal fit between user and prosthesis.
methodsA qualitative meta-synthesis using a 'best-fit framework' approach was performed by searching five databases (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019126973). Studies were considered eligible if they contained qualitative content about adults with major unilateral upper limb defects experienced in using commercially available upper limb prostheses and focused on upper limb prosthesis users' opinions. Results of the meta-synthesis were validated with end-users (n = 11) in a focus group.
resultsOut of 6247 articles, 19 studies were included. An overview of six main themes ('physical', 'activities and participation', 'mental', 'social', 'rehabilitation, cost and prosthetist services' and 'prosthesis related factors') containing 86 subthemes that could affect prosthesis choice was created. Of these subthemes, 19 were added by the focus group. Important subthemes were 'work/school', 'functionality' and 'reactions from public'. Opinions of MHP-users were scarce. MHPs were experienced as more dexterous and life-like but also as less robust and difficult to control.
conclusionThe huge number of factors that could determine upper limb prosthesis choice explains that preferences vary greatly. The created overview can be of great value to identify preferences and facilitate user-involvement in the selection process. Ultimately, this may contribute to a more successful match between user and prosthesis, resulting in a decrease of abandonment and increase of cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.