Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32602846›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2020

Acceptability and Utility of an Open-Access, Online Single-Session Intervention Platform for Adolescent Mental Health.

Jessica Lee Schleider, Mallory Dobias, Jenna Sung, Emma Mumper, Michael C Mullarkey

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05826392 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Single-Session Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults With Internalizing Problems

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaylor College of MedicineRan2023 to 2024Enrolled41ConditionsAnxiety, Depressive SymptomsArmsAdolescent/Young Adult Self-Administered Web-Based Single-Session Intervention
NCT07034027 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Building Emotion Regulation Skills in Young Adults Using an Online Single-Session Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled550ConditionsEmotional DysregulationArmsProject WAVE (Wise Awareness of Visiting Emotions), Emotionally Neutral Writing Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Identifying the active ingredients of a behavioral activation-based digital single-session intervention targeting depression.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica Lee SchleiderDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-1953
Mallory DobiasDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6814-3006
Jenna SungDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1232-7433
Emma MumperDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2777-1994
Michael C MullarkeyDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5437-4425

Funding

Testing Scalable, Single-Session Interventions for Adolescent Depression in the context of COVID-19DP5OD028123 · OD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI SCHLEIDER, JESSICA LEE · 2019 to 2023
$2.8M
NIH HHS DP5 OD028123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany youths with mental health needs are unable to access care. Single-session interventions (SSIs) have helped reduce youth psychopathology across multiple trials, promising to broaden access to effective, low-intensity supports. Online, self-guided SSIs may be uniquely scalable, particularly if they are freely available for as-needed use. However, the acceptability of online SSI and their efficacy have remained unexamined outside of controlled trials, and their practical utility is poorly understood.

objectiveWe evaluated the perceived acceptability and proximal effects of Project YES (Youth Empowerment & Support), an open-access platform offering three online SSIs for youth internalizing distress.

methodsAfter selecting one of three SSIs to complete, participants (ages 11-17 years) reported pre- and post-SSI levels of clinically relevant outcomes that SSIs may target (eg, hopelessness, self-hate) and perceived SSI acceptability. User-pattern variables, demographics, and depressive symptoms were collected to characterize youths engaging with YES.

resultsFrom September 2019 through March 2020, 694 youths accessed YES, 539 began, and 187 completed a 30-minute, self-guided SSI. SSI completers reported clinically elevated depressive symptoms, on average, and were diverse on several dimensions (53.75% non-white; 78.10% female; 43.23% sexual minorities). Regardless of SSI selection, completers reported pre- to post-program reductions in hopelessness (d

conclusionsResults support the perceived acceptability and utility of open-access, free-of-charge SSIs for youth experiencing internalizing distress.

trial registrationOpen Science Framework; osf.io/e52p3.

Indexed as

adolescentdepressioninternet interventioninterventionmental healthonline interventionssingle-session interventionyouth

Identifiers

PMID32602846
PMCPMC7367540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.