Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32602843›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Diabetes Self-Management in the Age of Social Media: Large-Scale Analysis of Peer Interactions Using Semiautomated Methods.

Sahiti Myneni, Brittney Lewis, Tavleen Singh, Kristi Paiva, Seon Min Kim, Adrian V Cebula, Gloria Villanueva, Jing Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Seeking Health Information and Social Support in the Diabetes Online Community.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sahiti MyneniUniversity of Texas School of Biomedical Informatics at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9211-1626
Brittney LewisCenter on Smart and Connected Health Technologies, School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9015-4315
Tavleen SinghUniversity of Texas School of Biomedical Informatics at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1721-4780
Kristi PaivaCenter on Smart and Connected Health Technologies, School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3124-9584
Seon Min KimCenter on Smart and Connected Health Technologies, School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-9335
Adrian V CebulaCenter on Smart and Connected Health Technologies, School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4715-9521
Gloria VillanuevaCenter on Smart and Connected Health Technologies, School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1984-6925
Jing WangCenter on Smart and Connected Health Technologies, School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4012-0977
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

Pragmatics to Reveal Intention in Social Media (PRISM) for Health PromotionR01LM012974 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MYNENI, SAHITI · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnline communities have been gaining popularity as support venues for chronic disease management. User engagement, information exposure, and social influence mechanisms can play a significant role in the utility of these platforms.

objectiveIn this paper, we characterize peer interactions in an online community for chronic disease management. Our objective is to identify key communications and study their prevalence in online social interactions.

methodsThe American Diabetes Association Online community is an online social network for diabetes self-management. We analyzed 80,481 randomly selected deidentified peer-to-peer messages from 1212 members, posted between June 1, 2012, and May 30, 2019. Our mixed methods approach comprised qualitative coding and automated text analysis to identify, visualize, and analyze content-specific communication patterns underlying diabetes self-management.

resultsQualitative analysis revealed that "social support" was the most prevalent theme (84.9%), followed by "readiness to change" (18.8%), "teachable moments" (14.7%), "pharmacotherapy" (13.7%), and "progress" (13.3%). The support vector machine classifier resulted in reasonable accuracy with a recall of 0.76 and precision 0.78 and allowed us to extend our thematic codes to the entire data set.

conclusionsModeling health-related communication through high throughput methods can enable the identification of specific content related to sustainable chronic disease management, which facilitates targeted health promotion.

Indexed as

diabetesdigital healthself-managementsocial media

Identifiers

PMID32602843
PMCPMC7367515
OpenAlexW3033974124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.