Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32602834›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Divergent sensory investment mirrors potential speciation via niche partitioning across

Ian W Keesey, Veit Grabe, Markus Knaden, Bill S Hansson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Sensory Ecology of Speciation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neural divergence and hybrid disruption between ecologically isolatedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ian W KeeseyMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (MPICE), Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3339-7249
Veit GrabeMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (MPICE), Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0736-2771
Markus Knaden *Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (MPICE), Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6710-1071
Bill S Hansson *Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (MPICE), Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4811-1223

Funding

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Open-access funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The examination of phylogenetic and phenotypic characteristics of the nervous system, such as behavior and neuroanatomy, can be utilized as a means to assess speciation. Recent studies have proposed a fundamental tradeoff between two sensory organs, the eye and the antenna. However, the identification of ecological mechanisms for this observed tradeoff have not been firmly established. Our current study examines several monophyletic species within the

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsArthropod AntennaeCompound Eye, ArthropodCourtshipDrosophilaEcologyEcosystemFemaleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMalePhenotypePhylogenySmellSpecies SpecificitybehaviorD. melanogasterecologyevolutionevolutionary biologyneurobiologyneuroscienceolfactoryvisual

Identifiers

PMID32602834
PMCPMC7402680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.