Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32602658›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2020

Using a HIV prevention cascade for identifying missed opportunities in PrEP delivery in Kenya: results from a programmatic surveillance study.

Daniel Were, Abednego Musau, Jane Mutegi, Patricia Ongwen, Griffins Manguro, Mercy Kamau, Tom Marwa, Hellen Gwaro, Irene Mukui, Marya Plotkin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Impact of Anti-LGBTQAmerican journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daniel WereJhpiego, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-6538-002X
Abednego MusauJhpiego, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jane MutegiJhpiego, Nairobi, Kenya.
Patricia OngwenJhpiego, Nairobi, Kenya.
Griffins ManguroInternational Center for Reproductive Health, Mombasa, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-9226-0955
Mercy KamauJhpiego, Nairobi, Kenya.
Tom MarwaJhpiego, Nairobi, Kenya.
Hellen GwaroJhpiego, Nairobi, Kenya.
Irene MukuiNational AIDS and STI Control Program, Nairobi, Kenya.
Marya PlotkinJhpiego, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jason ReedJhpiego, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1146198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHIV prevention cascades have been systematically evaluated in high-income countries, but steps in the pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) service delivery cascade have not been systematically quantified in sub-Saharan Africa. We analysed missed opportunities in the PrEP cascade in a large-scale project serving female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM) and adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Kenya.

methodsProgrammatic surveillance was conducted using routine programme data from 89 project-supported sites from February 2017 to December 2019, and complemented by qualitative data. Healthcare providers used nationally approved tools to document service statistics. The analyses examined proportions of people moving onto the next step in the PrEP continuum, and identified missed opportunities. Missed opportunities were defined as implementation gaps exemplified by the proportion of individuals who could have potentially accessed each step of the PrEP cascade and did not. We also assessed trends in the cascade indicators at monthly intervals. Qualitative data were collected through 28 focus group discussions with 241 FSW, MSM, AGYW and healthcare providers, and analysed thematically to identify reasons underpinning the missed opportunities.

resultsDuring the study period, 299,798 individuals tested HIV negative (211,927 FSW, 47,533 MSM and 40,338 AGYW). Missed opportunities in screening for PrEP eligibility was 58% for FSW, 45% for MSM and 78% for AGYW. Of those screened, 28% FSW, 25% MSM and 65% AGYW were ineligible. Missed opportunities for PrEP initiation were lower among AGYW (8%) compared to FSW (72%) and MSM (75%). Continuation rates were low across all populations at Month-1 (ranging from 29% to 32%) and Month-3 (6% to 8%). Improvements in average annual Month-1 (from 26% to 41%) and Month-3 (from 4% to 15%) continuation rates were observed between 2017 and 2019. While initiation rates were better among younger FSW, MSM and AGYW (<30 years), the reverse was true for continuation.

conclusionsThe application of a PrEP cascade framework facilitated this large-scale oral PrEP programme to conduct granular programmatic analysis, detecting "leaks" in the cascade. These informed programme adjustments to mitigate identified gaps resulting in improvement of selected programmatic outcomes. PrEP programmes are encouraged to introduce the cascade analysis framework into new and existing programming to optimize HIV prevention outcomes.

Indexed as

Pre-Exposure ProphylaxisPreventive Health ServicesAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHealth Care SurveysHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansKenyaLongitudinal StudiesMaleMass ScreeningSexual and Gender MinoritiesSex WorkersAnti-HIV AgentscascadesHIV preventionkey and vulnerable populationsmissed opportunitiesPrEPsub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID32602658
PMCPMC7325512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.