Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32602650›Full record

ReviewCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2020

A Cancer Biologist's Primer on Machine Learning Applications in High-Dimensional Cytometry.

Timothy J Keyes, Pablo Domizi, Yu-Chen Lo, Garry P Nolan, Kara L Davis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Making the most of high-dimensional cytometry data.Immunology and cell biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Timothy J KeyesMedical Scientist Training Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0003-0423-9679
Pablo DomiziDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Yu-Chen LoDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Garry P NolanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology | Baxter Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Kara L DavisDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Funding

Systems Biology CoreU19AI100627 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI NOLAN, GARRY P · 2012 to 2021
$49.1M
The Cellular Response to Elafin in PAHP01HL108797 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RABINOVITCH, MARLENE · 2011 to 2021
$19.7M
Spatial-Genomic Integrative Multi-Species Analysis of Lymph Node MetastasisU54CA209971 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NOLAN, GARRY P, PLEVRITIS, SYLVIA KATINA · 2016 to 2021
$11.0M
Stanford Tissue Mapping CenterU54HG010426 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, MICHAEL P. · 2018 to 2021
$5.1M
Predicting Post-treatment Relapse in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using Single-cell ProteomicsF31CA239365 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KEYES, TIMOTHY JAMES · 2019 to 2020
$78k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA239365NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209971NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG010426NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL108797NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI100627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of machine learning and artificial intelligence to high-dimensional cytometry data sets has increasingly become a staple of bioinformatic data analysis over the past decade. This is especially true in the field of cancer biology, where protocols for collecting multiparameter single-cell data in a high-throughput fashion are rapidly developed. As the use of machine learning methodology in cytometry becomes increasingly common, there is a need for cancer biologists to understand the basic theory and applications of a variety of algorithmic tools for analyzing and interpreting cytometry data. We introduce the reader to several keystone machine learning-based analytic approaches with an emphasis on defining key terms and introducing a conceptual framework for making translational or clinically relevant discoveries. The target audience consists of cancer cell biologists and physician-scientists interested in applying these tools to their own data, but who may have limited training in bioinformatics. © 2020 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeoplasmsComputational BiologyHumansMachine LearningProteomicscancercomputational cytometrydata sciencemachine learningmass cytometry

Identifiers

PMID32602650
PMCPMC7416435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.